llvm dev - Feb 2013 - [LLVMdev] GSoC 2013

Dear All,

GSoC 2013 is coming! This means it's a good time to refresh the Open
Projects pages. So, please, add your ideas there, remove old /
unimportant stuff, tweak current ideas. It's really important to have
these pages up-to-date by the time of GSoC (next couple of weeks).

Your help is needed!

-- 
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Hi Anton,

I think it would be worth to remove this signature in the bottom line:

Last modified: $Date: 2009/12/16 09:03:23 $

Otherwise, new people may think this page is long time abandoned :)

Also, a question: may side projects that use LLVM enlist the
mutually-beneficial tasks and add new categories? For example, we are
interested specifically in Polly & GPU backend, plus some minor core
infrastructure improvements.

Thanks,
- Dima.

2013/2/27 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
> Dear All,
>
> GSoC 2013 is coming! This means it's a good time to refresh the Open
> Projects pages. So, please, add your ideas there, remove old /
> unimportant stuff, tweak current ideas. It's really important to have
> these pages up-to-date by the time of GSoC (next couple of weeks).
>
> Your help is needed!
>
> --
> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130227/945579ec/attachment.html>

I'd like to see some ideas around improving the Microsoft ABI backend.

There are a lot of open bugs / work-in-progress patches in the tracker so
it would be nice to have someone fixing or bugs or cleaning the patches,
adding tests and sending them for review.


On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at
kernelgen.org>wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> I think it would be worth to remove this signature in the bottom line:
>
> Last modified: $Date: 2009/12/16 09:03:23 $
>
> Otherwise, new people may think this page is long time abandoned :)
>
> Also, a question: may side projects that use LLVM enlist the
> mutually-beneficial tasks and add new categories? For example, we are
> interested specifically in Polly & GPU backend, plus some minor core
> infrastructure improvements.
>
> Thanks,
> - Dima.
>
> 2013/2/27 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> GSoC 2013 is coming! This means it's a good time to refresh the
Open
>> Projects pages. So, please, add your ideas there, remove old /
>> unimportant stuff, tweak current ideas. It's really important to
have
>> these pages up-to-date by the time of GSoC (next couple of weeks).
>>
>> Your help is needed!
>>
>> --
>> With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
>> Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>

-- 
João Matos
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130227/af872222/attachment.html>

On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Dmitry Mikushin <dmitry at kernelgen.org>
wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> I think it would be worth to remove this signature in the bottom line:
>
> Last modified: $Date: 2009/12/16 09:03:23 $
>
> Otherwise, new people may think this page is long time abandoned :)
It indicates that it *is* long-abandoned! We need to start actively
adding to it.

Maybe it would get more traffic if we brought the page into the Sphinx
docs? That way, developers can easily modify it without having to
check out another (little-known) SVN repo. Anton, what do you think
about that? It might be good to start fresh to ensure a high
signal/noise (up to date/out of date) ratio.

-- Sean Silva

Hi Dima
> Also, a question: may side projects that use LLVM enlist the
> mutually-beneficial tasks and add new categories? For example, we are
> interested specifically in Polly & GPU backend, plus some minor core
> infrastructure improvements.
It seems there is "TODO" page at http://polly.llvm.org/todo.html.
Maybe it should contain OpenProject or something like this around.

--
With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov
Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University