On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Andrew Sorensen <digegoo at gmail.com> wrote:> I apologize to everyone for the tone of this email. > I had a bad day yesterday. > > I'll start having a look at how I might be able to > contribute to MCJIT. >While you're waiting for others to reply, I would suggest to google this list's archives for MCJIT discussions. Just within the past year there were many, including some which, IIRC, discussed exactly this issue of lazy compilation, dynamic function loading and so forth. Eli
Eli, do you happen to know if we have a PR tracking this issue? (you seem like you would be the person to know) -- Sean Silva
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:> Eli, do you happen to know if we have a PR tracking this issue? (you > seem like you would be the person to know)I used to hack on MCJIT in the past while being at Intel. Since I moved to a different job I've been focusing on other parts of LLVM and haven't been really in touch with the MCJIT parts for a long time. Andy Kaylor (the MCJIT code owner, CCd) is a better candidate to give a meaningful answer to the OP, at least from his perspective. Eli