llvm dev - Nov 2012 - [LLVMdev] missing polly 3.2 branch?

Tobi,
   It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night.
Shouldn't there be
one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release?
         Jack

Hi Pawel,

Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the
'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing,
etc.).

-bw

On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>
wrote:
> Tobi,
>   It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night.
Shouldn't there be
> one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release?
>         Jack
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Bill,
> Hi Pawel,
> 
> Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact
the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release
(testing, etc.).
Sure.

But I do not know much about polly so 'polly' guys please fill me on
the details. For the 3.2 release I will need:

- to know how to build it
seems to be covered here http://polly.llvm.org/get_started.html
but any hints/comments/scripts would be very helpful

- how to do the acceptance test and criteria for go/no-go
is the make polly-test enough?
or we need to run more extensive tests like PolyBench?
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~pouchet/software/polybench/

- polly release notes for the 3.2 release
> 
> -bw
> 
Pawel
> On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at
bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote:
> 
>> Tobi,
>>   It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night.
Shouldn't there be
>> one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release?
>>         Jack
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
> 
> 
>