search for: bromo

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> >&gt...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:17:28PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 20...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:43:42PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 31, 20...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin > > specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due > > to lli on darwin not accepting piped input such that the test... &gt...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:53:50PM -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: >> > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin >&gt...

On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:32:35AM -0800, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Feb 3, 2013, at 2:32 AM, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> >>>> I've encountered this issue in a real code and would be glad to get t...

...iteria for go/no-go is the make polly-test enough? or we need to run more extensive tests like PolyBench? http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~pouchet/software/polybench/ - polly release notes for the 3.2 release > > -bw > Pawel > On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > >> Tobi, >> It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be >> one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release? >> Jack >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM De...

Tobi, It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release? Jack

Hi Pawel, Could you branch polly as well for the 3.2 release? We will need to contact the 'polly' guys to figure out how best to add it to the release (testing, etc.). -bw On Nov 12, 2012, at 5:48 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > Tobi, > It appears that a polly 3.2 branch wasn't created last night. Shouldn't there be > one now that polly is part of the llvm 3.2 release? > Jack > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LL...

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > While testing llvm/polly svn on x86_64-apple-darwin10/11/12, I noticed that three darwin > specific polly-test regressions exist. At least part of these failures appear to be due > to lli on darwin not accepting piped input such that the test... > > opt -loa...

lld definitely shouldn't be that big. I would expect 10MB at most. Can you check whether something weird is happening, like lld being built with debug info? -- Sean Silva On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > When lld-3.4 is added to the tools directory of the llvm source tree > as lld, the resulting cmake build produces a huge number of static libs and > bloats the overall package from... > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 86361440 Nov 19 21:09 > llvm34_3.4-0_da...

...oc zones) will allow us to remove the CF dependency together with all the hacks. I'm trying to check if this is true. The current plan is to have dynamic runtime for both iOS (for which we don't have any other option) and Mac OS. On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:46:09AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: >> +kledzik at apple.com >> The dynamic runtime is using dylib interposition (google for >> "__DATA,__interpose). >> If I'm understanding correctly (Nick, can you please...

Hi Jack, Because of the new changes and the fact that we have only 2 days before branching for 2.5, please retest the Fortran front end as soon as you can to see if the problem has been resolved. Thanks! -bw On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 svn when built on > i686-apple-darwin9 still produces the bogus warnings... > > f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran > f951: warning: command line option &quo...

...ecting to machines running ssh 2.3.0's sshd2 server. While the connections occur with no problem after awhile the connection fails when idle with the following error message... Hm, dispatch protocol error: type 20 plen 136 Any idea why this is happening? Please e-mail responses to howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu since I don't read this list much. Jack ps Oh, is the problem with ssh 2.3.0 ssh2 clients connecting to openssh going to be fixed soon or do we have to wait for a fix in ssh v2.3.x?

...out all the potential CF bugs so they can be fixed for darwin13. Nick, I could open a radar with stand-alone testcases generated with -static-libasan -fsanitize=address from the g++ testsuite for that purpose if it would help. > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 09:46:09AM -0800, Alexander Potapenko wrote: > >> +kledzik at apple.com > >> The dynamic runtime is using dylib interposition (google for > >> "__DATA,__interpose). > >> If I'm understanding correct...

On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote: > Chris and Bill, > I have tested the proposed patch from... > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2008-August/016490.html > > under i686-apple-darwin9 and it solves the problems building gfortran > from llvm svn. The resulting compiler works f...

+glider Weird, we haven't seen problems with this test for quite a while. On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 12:08 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu>wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:35:47PM +0400, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > > > Can this be fixed before the 3.2 release? > > Given that release is tomorrow, then - no, unfortunately. > > Well if you can't fix the bug by tomorrow, can't you at least...

...VM-dev when I am close to finishing this. Thanks for checking, Nadav -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Jack Howarth Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 15:54 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Cc: llvm-commits%40cs.uiuc.edu at bromo.med.uc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] r135144 Nadav, Is http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20110711/123994.html the full implementation of vector-select to fix http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2314 or are there still more parts of this to be committed? If PR2314 is fixed, h...

On 2013-02-04 05:57, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Feb 3, 2013, at 11:28 AM, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo.med.uc.edu> wrote: ... >> At the risk of hijacking the thread, are there any plans to make -traditional-cpp >> in clang completely emulate the behavior in llvm-gcc such that imake can be built >> with it (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45509). This will be an is...