search for: bitten

With my functional tests (on PgSQL) I get strange errors like this 1) Error: test_create(AufgabeControllerTest): ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: ERROR: duplicate key violates unique constraint "aufgaben_pkey" Tracking this down, I found that sequences are only reset for some of the tables I''m using. The reason? Inconsistent singularization. I won''t go so far as

Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:44 -0700 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner: > Its not just a matter of checking major/minor versions. It also depends on > the target and in some cases the OS. > http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc > > So for example, GCC 3.3.3 on Suse or GCC 3.4.0 on linux/x86 > (32-bit) has issues. Is it easy to check these kinds of things? uname

Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:44 -0700 schrieb Tanya M. Lattner: > >> Its not just a matter of checking major/minor versions. It also depends on >> the target and in some cases the OS. >> http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc >> >> So for example, GCC 3.3.3 on Suse or GCC 3.4.0 on linux/x86 >> (32-bit) has

> I guess it could be done for things like 4.1.1 or a couple of others on > the list. This gcc version always worked fine for me on ubuntu linux (though it might have been 4.1.2, I don't recall). Ciao, Duncan.

Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 13:03 +0100 schrieb Duncan Sands: > Hi Joachim, > > > I have to report that the Ubuntu gcc-4.1 will fail. 'make' would run > > without giving more than a few warnings, but 'make install' will > > complain that it doesn't know how to build one of the intermediate > > targets and error out (some VMCore/tablegen file IIRC,

Am Donnerstag, den 20.03.2008, 15:27 -0700 schrieb Shantonu Sen: > llvm's ./configure already does that for gcc < 3. > > What are valid versions? Exactly 4.0 and 4.2? 4.0 and >=4.2? There's a list at http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc so there is a reasonable basis. The list isn't comprehensive, of course, and will likely grow in the future. OTOH

On Mar 20, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Hi all, > > I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the > (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. > The error message that I got was this: > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' > make[1]: *** No rule to make target > `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen',

Dear R-help, I was bitten by the behavior of all() when given logical(0): It is TRUE! (And any(logical(0)) is FALSE.) Wouldn't it be better to return logical(0) in both cases? The problem surfaced because some un-named individual called randomForest(x, y, xtest, ytest,...), and gave y as a two-level factor, but ytest...

>> I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the >> (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. >> The error message that I got was this: >> make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target >> `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen', needed by >>

Hi all, I just forgot to ./configure with CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2, getting the (broken-for-LLVM) gcc-4.1 as a compiler. The error message that I got was this: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore' make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/Release/bin/tblgen', needed by `/home/jo/llvm-wrk/lib/VMCore/Release/Intrinsics.gen.tmp'. Stop.

llvm's ./configure already does that for gcc < 3. What are valid versions? Exactly 4.0 and 4.2? 4.0 and >=4.2? dnl Verify that GCC is version 3.0 or higher if test "$GCC" = "yes" then AC_COMPILE_IFELSE([[#if !defined(__GNUC__) || __GNUC__ < 3 #error Unsupported GCC version #endif ]], [], [AC_MSG_ERROR([gcc 3.x required, but you have a lower version])]) fi

...to survive the pain of the day job. It''s for the professional J2EE developer converts out there. Let''s say someone hired you to write a Basecamp clone, but it has to be done in Java, say on the Tomcat or JBoss platform. What does your stack look like now that you''ve been bitten by the Ruby/Rails rhetoric? Cheers, Ed

Because almost no other piece of software out there doesn't have 'check' depend on rebuilding the target it's testing and it's bitten people whereas other than the lameness of our build system needing to recurse all the directories to figure out that all has already been rebuilt there's no penalty to requiring the dependency. :) -eric On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com> wrote: > Er...

I've been thinking recently that we should re-enable DIR_INDEX in mke2fs by default. When it first came out, we had done this and were bitten by a few bugs in the code. However, this code has been in heavy use for several thousand filesystem years in Lustre, if not elsewhere, and I'm inclined to think it is pretty safe these days. Likewise, RHEL/FC have had RESIZE_INODE as a standard feature for a good time now, and this should pro...

Am Freitag, den 21.03.2008, 06:56 -0700 schrieb Shantonu Sen: > I recommend you don't parse version strings. In fact I switch the > check to use AC_COMPILE precisely for the reason that gcc --version is > totally unreliable and vendor specific. For example, what's the > regular expression that tells you what the GCC version is: > i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC)

I have just been bitten by a quirk in the behaviour of model.matrix. I used model.matrix inside a function, and passed to it a formula that was built elsewhere. The formula was of the form ``y ~ x + w + z''. Now, model.matrix cheerfully accepts formulae of this form, although it only ***needs*** the right hand s...

...sign is that the frontend (if it attaches a TD string) >> is *required* to match the code generator: >> http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#datalayout > > Chris, > > Do we actually verify this anywhere? No. This has been on my todo list for a long time - people regularly get bitten by it. Ciao, Duncan.

One of our machines are being bitten by that bug, once every 2-4 weeks or so xenconsoled dies and all the VMs stop responding intil xenconsoled is restarted. I googled for it and I saw many people reporting it but no solution for it. Does anyone know if it is solved in 5.5? I can't upgrade the box (it's a production box) unl...

I have a workstation with a Gigbyte board and an Intel Corporation 82801EB (ICH5) SATA Controller (rev 02) that's apparently getting bitten by https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502499 It's running CentOS 5.4 32 bit, and the user is suffering from high load and sluggish response whenever a disk write of more than a few MB is made. iostat shows the disk at 100%. [root at marge ~]# uname -a Linux marge.gizmopartners.com 2...

I recommend you don't parse version strings. In fact I switch the check to use AC_COMPILE precisely for the reason that gcc --version is totally unreliable and vendor specific. For example, what's the regular expression that tells you what the GCC version is: i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1 (GCC) 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5470) (Aspen 5470.3) Per the rest of this thread, you can't