llvm dev - Jan 2012 - [LLVMdev] Resolving branch instr with label "$BB0_-1"

Hello All.
On a particular target the back-end generates an instruction like:
beqz      r2, "$BB0_-1"

 
Is it a back-end specific issue? Could someone please help me figure out how
this gets resolved? What confuses me is, all other branches are correctly
labelled and resolved! 

Thanks.
Girish.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120124/ba0287da/attachment.html>

May be you have branched to a BB which has been deleted.

On 24 January 2012 20:16, girish gulawani <girishvg at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hello All.
> On a particular target the back-end generates an instruction like:
> beqz      r2, "$BB0_-1"
>
> Is it a back-end specific issue? Could someone please help me figure out
> how this gets resolved? What confuses me is, all other branches are
> correctly labelled and resolved!
>
> Thanks.
> Girish.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>

-- 
Sincerely,

Aries Wu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120124/378b89d9/attachment.html>

 
Hi Aries.
Thanks very much!

Precisely this is the situation! There're two consecutive branches (br1cond
and br2uncond). Inside of AnalyzeBranch, there's an opcode swap of br2uncond
(ex. j_foward to j_backward). There I do BuildMI (newOpcode) and followed by
br2uncond->eraseFromParent(). This results in br1cond loosing it's
label/offset. How could I resolve this?

Best regards,
Girish.

May be you have branched to a BB which has been deleted.
>
>
>On 24 January 2012 20:16, girish gulawani <girishvg at yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Hello All.
>>On a particular target the back-end generates an instruction like:
>>beqz      r2, "$BB0_-1"
>>
>> 
>>Is it a back-end specific issue? Could someone please help me figure out
how this gets resolved? What confuses me is, all other branches are correctly
labelled and resolved! 
>>
>>
>>Thanks.Girish.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>LLVM Developers mailing list
>>LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>>
>>
>
>
>-- 
>Sincerely,
>
>Aries Wu
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120124/0716c5e6/attachment.html>