llvm dev - Oct 2011 - [LLVMdev] release notes: please mention Intrinsic::memory_barrier removal in 3.0

Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch?

-bw

On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced
with fence intrinsics.
>> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update
the 3.0 release notes?
>> Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone
from 3.0.
> 
> r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes.
> 
> Any comments on your transition would be appreciated.
> 
> -Eli
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:
> Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch?
r142994 is necessary; I thought I already sent you an email about
that.  r142998 only touches the release notes; it looks like you're
hacking on those on trunk.

-Eli
> On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>
>> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and
replaced with fence intrinsics.
>>> Could someone who understands this change better than me please
update the 3.0 release notes?
>>> Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is
gone from 3.0.
>>
>> r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes.
>>
>> Any comments on your transition would be appreciated.
>>
>> -Eli
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
>

Dunno if I got it. It's in now. Thanks!

-bw

On Oct 26, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at
apple.com> wrote:
>> Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch?
> 
> r142994 is necessary; I thought I already sent you an email about
> that.  r142998 only touches the release notes; it looks like you're
> hacking on those on trunk.
> 
> -Eli
> 
>> On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
>> 
>>> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and
replaced with fence intrinsics.
>>>> Could someone who understands this change better than me please
update the 3.0 release notes?
>>>> Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is
gone from 3.0.
>>> 
>>> r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes.
>>> 
>>> Any comments on your transition would be appreciated.
>>> 
>>> -Eli
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>> 
>>