search for: r142994

...t; Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. >> Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? >> Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone from 3.0. > > r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes. > > Any comments on your transition would be appreciated. > > -Eli > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.e...

On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > Do these need to go into the 3.0 branch? r142994 is necessary; I thought I already sent you an email about that. r142998 only touches the release notes; it looks like you're hacking on those on trunk. -Eli > On Oct 25, 2011, at 5:59 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > >> 2011/10/25 Török Edwin <edwintorok at gmail.com>: >>&gt...

Hi, Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone from 3.0. Best regards, --Edwin

...: > Hi, > > Looks like the memory_barrier intrinsic got removed in 3.0 and replaced with fence intrinsics. > Could someone who understands this change better than me please update the 3.0 release notes? > Also the LangRef still mentions llvm.memory.barrier but this is gone from 3.0. r142994 and r142998 for the relevant changes. Any comments on your transition would be appreciated. -Eli