llvm dev - Mar 2011 - [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Announcing: LLVM 2.9 RC2 Testing Phase

Hi all,

Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were
addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing.

This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and
complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the
sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang and
llvm-gcc.

Sources:

	clang-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
	llvm-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
	llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
	llvm-test-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz

Available here:

	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/

-bw

We are no longer accepting patches to complete features. Any unfinished features
should have been disabled all ready. The only patches that we will accept are
those that fix a regression from the 2.8 release. We were fairly flexible with
allowing people to commit to the release branch in phase 1. But now only the
release manager may commit to the release branch. And the patches must be
approved by the code owners. No exceptions.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110325/2a86c80b/attachment.html>

On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 15:07, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were
> addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing.
>
> This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and
> complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download
> the sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both
> clang and llvm-gcc.
>
> Sources:
>
> clang-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
> llvm-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
> llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>  llvm-test-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>
> Available here:
>
> http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/
>
> -bw
>
> *We are no longer accepting patches to complete features.* Any unfinished
> features should have been disabled all ready. The only patches that we will
> accept are those that fix a regression from the 2.8 release. We were fairly
> flexible with allowing people to commit to the release branch in phase 1.
> But now only the release manager may commit to the release branch. And
> the patches *must* be approved by the code owners. No exceptions.
>
Tested with gcc 4.5.3 (20100324) on i686-w64-windows:

http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/gcc-4.5.3-windows_20110324.tar.xz
http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.tar.xz
http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.zip

[[[
********************
Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
Testing Time: 652.86s
********************
Failing Tests (1):
    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll

  Expected Passes    : 5246
  Expected Failures  : 46
  Unsupported Tests  : 546
  Unexpected Failures: 1
]]]

[[[
Failing Tests (1):
    LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll

  Expected Passes    : 5246
  Expected Failures  : 46
  Unsupported Tests  : 546
  Unexpected Failures: 1

FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll (2430 of 5839)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll' FAILED
********
************
Script:
--
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./llc.EXE <
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2/test/CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll
-march=x86-64 > C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-
obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp
grep {movzbl    %\[abcd\]h,}
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp
| C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./count 8
grep {%\[abcd\]h}
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp
| C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./not grep {%r\[\[:digit:\]\]*d}
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
Expected 8 lines, got 7.
--
]]]

--
Dongsheng
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110325/9804ec93/attachment.html>

On Mar 25, 2011, at 6:34 AM, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Tested with gcc 4.5.3 (20100324) on i686-w64-windows:
> 
> http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/gcc-4.5.3-windows_20110324.tar.xz
> http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.tar.xz
> http://i18n-zh.googlecode.com/files/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-win32.zip
> 
> [[[
> ********************
> Testing: 0 .. 10.. 20.. 30.. 40.. 50.. 60.. 70.. 80.. 90..
> Testing Time: 652.86s
> ********************
> Failing Tests (1):
>     LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll
> 
>   Expected Passes    : 5246
>   Expected Failures  : 46
>   Unsupported Tests  : 546
>   Unexpected Failures: 1
> ]]]
> 
> [[[
> Failing Tests (1):
>     LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll
> 
>   Expected Passes    : 5246
>   Expected Failures  : 46
>   Unsupported Tests  : 546
>   Unexpected Failures: 1
> 
> FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll (2430 of 5839)
> ******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll'
FAILED ********
> ************
> Script:
> --
> C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./llc.EXE <
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2/test/CodeGen/X86/h-registers-1.ll -march=x86-64
> C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-
> obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp
> grep {movzbl    %\[abcd\]h,}
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp |
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./count 8
> grep {%\[abcd\]h}
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/test/CodeGen/X86/Output/h-registers-1.ll.tmp |
C:/var/tmp/llvm-clang-2.9-rc2-obj/bin/./not grep {%r\[\[:digit:\]\]*d}
> --
> Exit Code: 1
> Command Output (stderr):
> --
> Expected 8 lines, got 7.
> --
Hi Dongsheng,

Could you send the output for this command? I haven't seen this failure crop
up before...

-bw

On 2011-03-25 08:07, Bill Wendling wrote:
> Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues were
addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing.
>
> This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems and
complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download the
sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang and
llvm-gcc.
>
> Sources:
>
> 	clang-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
> 	llvm-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
> 	llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
> 	llvm-test-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>
> Available here:
>
> 	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/
This change:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_29/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp?r1=127752&r2=128255&diff_format=h

causes:

FAIL: Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp (2268 of 2917)
******************** TEST 'Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp' FAILED
********************
Script:
--
/home/dim/obj/llvm-1/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wall
-fblocks /home/dim/src/llvm-2.9rc2/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp
--
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
   Line 73: redefinition of 'f'
error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
   Line 5: previous definition is here
2 errors generated.
--

********************

This is because the second definition of f() is not enclosed in a
separate namespace.  It looks like it is also in trunk, btw...

On Mar 25, 2011, at 4:40 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-03-25 08:07, Bill Wendling wrote:
>> Well! we had a rather fruitful phase 1 testing round. Several issues
were addressed. After a bit of a delay, we are ready for phase 2 testing.
>> 
>> This phase is to make sure that no patches submitted to fix problems
and complete features in phase 1 caused further difficulties. Please download
the sources, compile them, and then compile as much as you can with both clang
and llvm-gcc.
>> 
>> Sources:
>> 
>> 	clang-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-gcc-4.2-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 	llvm-test-2.9rc2.src.tar.gz
>> 
>> Available here:
>> 
>> 	http://llvm.org/pre-releases/2.9/
> 
> This change:
>
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_29/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp?r1=127752&r2=128255&diff_format=h
> 
> causes:
> 
> FAIL: Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp (2268 of 2917)
> ******************** TEST 'Clang :: SemaCXX/goto.cpp' FAILED
********************
> Script:
> --
> /home/dim/obj/llvm-1/Release+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify
-Wall -fblocks /home/dim/src/llvm-2.9rc2/tools/clang/test/SemaCXX/goto.cpp
> --
> Exit Code: 1
> Command Output (stderr):
> --
> error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
>  Line 73: redefinition of 'f'
> error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
>  Line 5: previous definition is here
> 2 errors generated.
> --
> 
> ********************
> 
> This is because the second definition of f() is not enclosed in a
> separate namespace.  It looks like it is also in trunk, btw...
The patch that added this part of the test needed a previous patch. I applied
it. It looks like there will be an RC3.

-bw