search for: yazdani

On 21 July 2010 22:14, Reza Yazdani <ry.yazdani at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. > It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build > them with LTO now. I followed the directions in > "http://...

Hello, I down loaded "llvm-gcc4.2-2.7-x86_64-linux" and I built Spec2006 with it. It is great and except for one benchmark the rest work fine. I want to build them with LTO now. I followed the directions in " http://llvm.org/docs/GoldPlugin.html" and built ar, nm-new, and ld-new in binutils. I also built libLLVMgold.so. I get the following error: llvm-gcc: -use-gold-plugin,

On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 > out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I > made a mistake in my build? Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't think it's normal. You may have...

Hi, I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17 of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in my build? Reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100722/4c4a81a9/attachment.html>

...6.52 -- S 481.wrf -- 0.00140 RE 482.sphinx3 -- 3.19 -- S On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 4:18 PMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > > Hi, >> >> I ran Spec2006 with -O4. All integer benchmarks passed, but only 8 out 17 >> of floating point benchmarks passed. Is this normal or I made a mistake in >> my build? >> > > Hi Reza. Somebody on Linux should answer, but I don't thi...

Hi Reza, -O4 is the highest level of LLVM optimization that I know of. But, I don't know if it has been tried on Spec2006. IIRC, Dan Gohman has run Spec. tests with LLVM, so he can provide more info. - fariborz On Jul 19, 2010, at 6:06 PM, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Hi, > > What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to > get the best performance numbers on x86? > > Has anybody compared LLVM Spec2006 numbers with GCC 4.5 base? > > reza _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers...

433.milc, 447.deall, and 450.soplex are run as part of the nightly tests on Darwin (=MacOSX) in a way that closely approximates -O4. They are working there. I am inclined to suspect gold given that they work at -O3. Can a Linux person comment? On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:19 AMPDT, Reza Yazdani wrote: > Following is the list of fp benchmarks that fail. They all pass with > -O3, but some fail with -O4. I did the test run. > > Thanks, > Reza > > Estimated > Estimated > Base Base...

Hi, What are the best options to compile Spec2006 with LLVM compilers to get the best performance numbers on x86? Has anybody compared LLVM Spec2006 numbers with GCC 4.5 base? reza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100719/40cf38a5/attachment.html>

...chmark. LLVM came last in the performance. I did not use PFO for LLVM. I was wondering if any of you have used PFO in Spec2006 and can give me some idea about its effectiveness. I also like to know how and with what flags PFO works correctly and produces the optimal result. Thanks in advance, Reza Yazdani -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100827/c6853f8a/attachment.html>

...Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> Nathan Myers <ncm@cantrip.org> Nathan Straz <nstraz@redhat.com> Nathan Walp <faceprint@faceprint.com> Nathan Williams <nathan@traverse.com.au> Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@gnat.ca> Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> Naveen Burmi <naveenburmi@freescale.com> Naveen Gangadharan <ngangadh@qca.qualcomm.com> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@stericsson.com> Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vn...

...Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> Nathan Myers <ncm@cantrip.org> Nathan Straz <nstraz@redhat.com> Nathan Walp <faceprint@faceprint.com> Nathan Williams <nathan@traverse.com.au> Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@gnat.ca> Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> Naveen Burmi <naveenburmi@freescale.com> Naveen Gangadharan <ngangadh@qca.qualcomm.com> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@stericsson.com> Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vn...

...Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> Nathan Myers <ncm@cantrip.org> Nathan Straz <nstraz@redhat.com> Nathan Walp <faceprint@faceprint.com> Nathan Williams <nathan@traverse.com.au> Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@gnat.ca> Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> Naveen Burmi <naveenburmi@freescale.com> Naveen Gangadharan <ngangadh@qca.qualcomm.com> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@stericsson.com> Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vn...

...Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> Nathan Myers <ncm@cantrip.org> Nathan Straz <nstraz@redhat.com> Nathan Walp <faceprint@faceprint.com> Nathan Williams <nathan@traverse.com.au> Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Nathanael Noblet <nathanael@gnat.ca> Nathaniel Yazdani <n1ght.4nd.d4y@gmail.com> Naveen Burmi <naveenburmi@freescale.com> Naveen Gangadharan <ngangadh@qca.qualcomm.com> Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com> Naveen Kumar Gaddipati <naveen.gaddipati@stericsson.com> Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vn...