This patch eases building clang when present in the source tree. Since clang is revlocked to llvm, one usually updates them together, and builds them together. Ok? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang-3.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 794 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090119/7af7ed8a/attachment.obj> -------------- next part --------------
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
2009-Jan-19 19:55 UTC
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
On 19 Jan 2009, at 19:08, Mike Stump wrote:> This patch eases building clang when present in the source tree. > Since clang is revlocked to llvm, one usually updates them together, > and builds them together. > > Ok?In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner. It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare a patch? -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud. scient., danchr at cs.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:> In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner. > It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as > intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare > a patch?Are OPTIONAL_DIRS parallel? For some reason, I was assuming not.