Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "optional_dirs".
2009 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:
> In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner.
> It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as
> intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare
> a patch?
Are OPTIONAL_DIRS parallel? For some reason, I was assuming not.
2009 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
On 19 Jan 2009, at 21:16, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:
>> In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and
>> cleaner.
>> It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as
>> intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare
>> a patch?
>
> Are OPTIONAL_DIRS parallel? For some reason, I was assuming not.
Well, from my...
2009 Jan 19
3
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
On Jan 19, 2009, at 12:35 PM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2009, at 21:16, Mike Stump wrote:
>
>> On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen
>> wrote:
>>> In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and
>>> cleaner.
>>> It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as
>>> intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can
>>> prepare
>>> a patch?
>>
>> Are OPTIONAL_DIRS parallel? For some reaso...
2009 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
This patch eases building clang when present in the source tree.
Since clang is revlocked to llvm, one usually updates them together,
and builds them together.
Ok?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: clang-3.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 794 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
2009 Jan 19
0
[LLVMdev] building clang when present
On 19 Jan 2009, at 19:08, Mike Stump wrote:
> This patch eases building clang when present in the source tree.
> Since clang is revlocked to llvm, one usually updates them together,
> and builds them together.
>
> Ok?
In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner.
It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as
intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare
a patch?
--
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud. scient.,
danchr at cs.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com
2010 Sep 06
1
[LLVMdev] RFC: change build order (or location) of LLVMHello plugin
Good evening, Michael.
2010/9/5 Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com>:
> Do you know what the exact problem is? It would be best to fix the
> Makefile instead of moving it. And sense it is a transformation, the
> build system is broken if you _have_ to move it.
I am sorry, I don't understand what *the exact problem" is.
I can describe facts;
- Hello is the only
2005 May 29
0
[LLVMdev] Bug in Makefile
Hi,
I just updated from source and got this at the top of the master
Makefile:
LEVEL = .
DIRS = lib/System lib/Support utils lib
ifeq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),tools-only)
DIRS += tools
else
ifneq ($(MAKECMDGOALS),libs-only)
DIRS += runtime docs
OPTIONAL_DIRS = examples projects
endif
endif
This causes my build to be incorrect. In the general case, it doesn't
build the tools, and building the runtime without the tools causes the
build to crash. Also, the examples directory is empty, so building
into it causes an error. Can someone fix this...
2005 May 23
2
[LLVMdev] a question about LLCO
Hi Terry,
Reid is exactly right about the benefits of static (link-time)
optimization for whole programs. When all libraries are available, it
could alllow significantly better optimization without run-time
overhead.
But it is increasingly common today for libraries to be dynamically
linked. In these cases, you could get the benefits of LLVM
optimization in two ways, *if* you compile the
2004 Oct 23
1
[LLVMdev] UPDATE: Makefile.rules Changes (IMPORTANT)
...cp $(BUILD_SRC_DIR)/$(@D)/Makefile $(@D)/Makefile; \
> @@ -273,16 +267,19 @@
> $(MAKE) -C $(@D) $(subst $(@D)/.make,,$@) $(MFLAGS)
> endif
>
> -# Handle directories that may or may not exist
> +#---------------------------------------------------------
> +# Handle the OPTIONAL_DIRS options for directores that may
> +# or may not exist.
> +#---------------------------------------------------------
> ifdef OPTIONAL_DIRS
> -$(ALL_TARGETS)::
> +$(RECURSIVE_TARGETS)::
> $(VERB) for dir in $(OPTIONAL_DIRS); do \
> if [ -d $(BUILD_SRC_DIR)/$$dir ]; then\...
2007 Jul 21
0
[1127] trunk/wxruby2: Move shared C++ GC functions into separate file included into wx.i
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11/DTD/xhtml11.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /><style type="text/css"><!--
#msg dl { border: 1px #006 solid; background: #369; padding:
2005 May 19
3
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] llvm 'make install' build errors
Reid,
I think it is the first time it is run that the errors occcur !?
Not sure but that would seem logical.
Aaron
2013 Nov 01
4
[LLVMdev] [Proposal] Adding callback mechanism to Execution Engines
...compile every function reachable from the argument to
/// getPointerToFunction. If lazy compilation is turned on, the JIT will only
Index: Makefile
===================================================================
--- Makefile (revision 193441)
+++ Makefile (working copy)
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
OPTIONAL_DIRS := tools/clang/utils/TableGen
else
DIRS := lib/Support lib/TableGen utils lib/IR lib tools/llvm-shlib \
- tools/llvm-config tools docs unittests
+ tools/llvm-config tools CustomCallback docs unittests
OPTIONAL_DIRS := projects bindings
endif
Index: CustomCallback/CustomC...