search for: scient

...ssible. We can not tolerate any garbage in the files after a crash or sudden power failures. We have then decided to use ext3 with mode data=journal. Can I rely on this? We use kernel 2.6.5 on PowerPC 8260, and may be using newer kernels later in the project. Best regards -- Petter Larsen cand. scient. moreCom as 913 17 222

...fter a crash or sudden power > failures. We have then decided to use ext3 with mode data=journal. > > Can I rely on this? > We use kernel 2.6.5 on PowerPC 8260, and may be using newer kernels > later in the project. > > > Best regards > -- > Petter Larsen > cand. scient. > moreCom as > 913 17 222 > > > _______________________________________________ > Ext3-users mailing list > Ext3-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users -- Petter Larsen cand. scient. moreCom as 913 17 222

...? How do I solve the problem in the most appropriate way? convolve2=function2(x,y) { x<- c(rep.int(0,exp.length-1),x) n <- length(y<-c(y, rep.int(0, irf.length -1))) x <- fft(fft(x) * Conj(fft(y)), inverse=TRUE) return(Re(x)/n) } -- Best wishes/bedste hilsner Gunnar Hellmund cand. scient., PhD http://staff.pubhealth.ku.dk/~guhe/ --- ?If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking.?

Looks like I can't edit posts. Also of possible interest, I was using v1.0 of the unofficial patch by scient, available here (http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/downloads.php?do=file&id=240). However, I don't suspect that made a difference. If I get round to more thorough testing I'll add a version and some more notes to the appDB. Comments welcome.

...arithmically scaled axis: hist(log10(d), breaks=100, xaxt="n") abline(v= log10(1:10*10^rep(-9:3, each=10)), col="darkgrey" ); box() hist(log10(d), breaks=100, col="forestgreen", add=T) axis(1, log10(1:10*10^rep(-9:3, each=10)), labels=F) axis(1, -2:2, format(10^(-2:2), scient=3, drop0trailing=T) ) # the labels with lower values should be in the form of 10^x: axis(1, -8:-3, expression( 10^(-8:-3)) )# doesn't work, because expression returns only one output for(i in -8:-3) axis(1, i, expression(10^i)? ) # writes i at all locations expression does exactly what it shou...

Hello, Tatu > Is that correct? I think it's just something to be aware of. Currently we're aggressively merging globals by default. Do you think it will be better to provide special flag to control this behavior? -- WBR, Anton Korobeynikov

On Oct 17, 2008, at 7:30 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote: > Hello, Tatu > >> Is that correct? I think it's just something to be aware of. > Currently we're aggressively merging globals by default. Do you > think it > will be better to provide special flag to control this behavior? Please no flag. If we want to fix this problem, lets do it right. To me this

...lightly cleaner to mark the distinct objects in the LLVM intermediate representation? This would make the default case the one resulting in best code, and seems to me to follow the principle of structural equivalence of types (and values) used elsewhere. -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud.scient. danchr at daimi.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com

Oscar, I be willing to donate some machine time to you. How about a 2 x 3GHz Dual Core Intel Xeon with 8GB? The question is how to get past the NAT. Email me privately if interested. Regards Mark Kromis On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:12 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Reports arrived indicating that the LLVM cmake-based build system is > lacking some OS X specific work, which seems to be the OS of

Hi, > gcc: gcc version 4.1.2 20070925 (Red Hat 4.1.2-33) most likely the version of gcc you are using is broken. See http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#brokengcc Ciao, Duncan.

Hi, I am just starting a new project. I found that the above script rejects Autoconf versions later than 2.59, whereas it ought to accept them, imho. I had to edit the scrip to be able to use it with Autoconf 2.61. Also, aclocal gave the following warning: /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: warning: underquoted definition of AM_PATH_OAF /usr/share/aclocal/oaf.m4:4: run info '(automake)Extending

This patch eases building clang when present in the source tree. Since clang is revlocked to llvm, one usually updates them together, and builds them together. Ok? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: clang-3.patch Type: application/octet-stream Size: 794 bytes Desc: not available URL:

...ilds them together. > > Ok? In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner. It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare a patch? -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud. scient., danchr at cs.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com

On Jan 19, 2009, at 11:55 AM, Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen wrote: > In my humble opinion, using OPTIONAL_DIRS would be better and cleaner. > It may require some changes to ‘Makefile.rules’ to work as > intended, though. If there's interest in such a change, I can prepare > a patch? Are OPTIONAL_DIRS parallel? For some reason, I was assuming not.

...ay not actually be executed parallel with other directories, but I wouldn't consider that a problem, as Clang itself contains quite a lot of source files, libraries and directories. Parallelism within the Clang source should be Good Enough™ ;) -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud. scient., danchr at cs.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com

...bles, in order to circumvent the coding logic in model.matrix() (when there is no intercept term, the first factor is coded as dummy variables, one variable per level of the factor, which makes these models overparametrised), but that is perhaps a different story. :-) --=20 Bj=F8rn-Helge Mevik, dr.scient.

...s to the build system integrated, and plan to post a proposal of how to get it done within the next few days or so. Apart from a general overhaul of the Makefiles, I integrated Clang into much of the LLVM build system, for instance ‘llvm-config’. -- Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen, stud. scient., danchr at cs.au.dk, danchr at gmail.com

Reports arrived indicating that the LLVM cmake-based build system is lacking some OS X specific work, which seems to be the OS of choice for quite a few LLVM developers. I know there are sites out there that offer Linux shell accounts. Is there something similar for OS X, where building LLVM would be possible? A google search turned no solid results. Or would someone donate ssh access and approx.

Hi, When i wanted to build the llvm-gcc, i got the problem as following. ========================================================================================================================== cc1: /home/cllou/LLVM/llvm-2.4-dir/llvm-2.4/lib/Support/StringMap.cpp:177: void llvm::StringMapImpl::RemoveKey(llvm::StringMapEntryBase*): Assertion `V == V2 && "Didn't find

Hi, maybe someone could help me out here: I have a broken disk with serveral partitions (1-3 primary, 4 extended and 5-6 logical). I am able to get access to the primary partions and already recovered the data. I can see all partitions using fdisk -l /dev/hdc. But I cannot mount the logical ones: mount -t ext3 /dev/hdc5 /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on