Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "ccc_ld".
Did you mean:
cc_lt
2008 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] clang
Anton Korobeynikov dixit:
>> Any suggestions?
>Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct
>way of building clang.
Oh, I did. I took LLVM and Clang from the very same SVN revision even,
placed clang in llvm/tools/ and built. This has worked on GNU/Linux
for me once, but clang-current seems to rely on things not yet in llvm.
Like I said, I’m using r58565 for
2008 Nov 09
0
[LLVMdev] clang
Dixi quod…
>Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now).
Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works.
I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh
– http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression
tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then).
Now up to llvm-gcc *sigh*…
//mirabilos
--
Sometimes they [people] care too