search for: r58565

Dixi quod… >A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, >seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. However, clang r58565 does not build with llvm r58565 either: llvm[4]: Compiling BasicConstraintManager.cpp for Release-Asserts build mpcxx -I/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58565-0/llvm/include -I/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58565-0/llvm/tools/clang/lib/Analysis -DNDEBUG -I/usr/ports/lang/llvm/w-llvm-58565-0/llvm/tools/cl...

...m.org/get_started.html about correct >way of building clang. Oh, I did. I took LLVM and Clang from the very same SVN revision even, placed clang in llvm/tools/ and built. This has worked on GNU/Linux for me once, but clang-current seems to rely on things not yet in llvm. Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now). bye, //mirabilos -- > Hi, does anyone sell openbsd stickers by themselves and not packaged > with other products? No, the only way I've seen them sold is for $40 with a free OpenBSD CD. -- Haroon Khalid and Steve Shockley in gmane.os.openbsd.misc

Tanya M. Lattner dixit: >LLVMers, > >The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: >http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ Is it correct that there is no matching clang distfile? A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. (But then, maybe it’d be best anyway if I port llvm-current to MirBSD, because it’ll be easier

...ler driver… Which dependencies does llvm-gcc-4.2 have, besides the usual gmake, bison, working toolchain, gnat for building Ada, llvm? Specifically, does it also have the hilarious library dependencies (gmp, mpfr, etc)? What is the status of the other (besides C and C++) languages on llvm-gcc-4.2 r58565? I’ve read that Ada fails and Fortran has issues. How about ObjC, ObjC++, Java™? Speaking of Ada: is gnat from gcc 3.4.6 enough to build gnat/gcc4? Is there a recommended way to compile libstdc++ and libobjc to llvm byte code only (instead of native code), both to enable the use of more optimisat...

LLVMers, The 2.4 pre-release (v2) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.4/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary. 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make TEST=nightly report" and send me the

Hello, Thorsten >>A checkout of clang r58548 does not build with the prerelease, >>seems to require a newer version of llvm-current. That's correct. > Any suggestions? Please do read http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html about correct way of building clang. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

Dixi quod… >Like I said, I’m using r58565 for both llvm and clang (now). Must have been broken, as r58935 for both works. I’ve even fixed some system headers for clang now, and mksh – http://mirbsd.de/mksh – builds fine and passes the regression tests (with the Xcode version, about 83% of it failed, back then). Now up to llvm-gcc *sigh*…...

...dencies does llvm-gcc-4.2 have, besides the usual gmake, > bison, working toolchain, gnat for building Ada, llvm? Specifically, > does it also have the hilarious library dependencies (gmp, mpfr, etc)? > > What is the status of the other (besides C and C++) languages on > llvm-gcc-4.2 r58565? I’ve read that Ada fails and Fortran has > issues. > How about ObjC, ObjC++, Java™? > > Speaking of Ada: is gnat from gcc 3.4.6 enough to build gnat/gcc4? > > Is there a recommended way to compile libstdc++ and libobjc to llvm > byte code only (instead of native code), both...