thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn [Oct 2008]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Devang Patel

2008-Oct-31 16:44 UTC

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
>> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
>> I get a series of warning messages...
>>
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid for
C/C++/
>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is
valid for
>> C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-extra-args"
is valid
>> for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-format-zero-length"
is
>> valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-nonnull" is valid
for C/C++/
>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>
>> Is this something we can suppress easily for the 2.4 release?

Jack,

Try this not so elegant and untested patch.
-
Devang


Index: lang-specs.h
==================================================================---
lang-specs.h	(revision 57986)
+++ lang-specs.h	(working copy)
@@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
    "cc1 -E -lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN % 
(cpp_options) \
        %{E|M|MM:%(cpp_debug_options)}\
        %{!M:%{!MM:%{!E: -o %|.f |\n\
-    f951 %|.f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
+    f951 %|.f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) \
+    %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-format-
zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
+    %{J*} %{I*}\
        "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
        %(llvm_options) \
        -fpreprocessed %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:% 
(invoke_as)}}}}", 0, 0, 0},
@@ -25,21 +27,27 @@
    "cc1 -E -lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN % 
(cpp_options) \
        %{E|M|MM:%(cpp_debug_options)}\
        %{!M:%{!MM:%{!E: -o %|.f95 |\n\
-    f951 %|.f95 %{!ffixed-form:-ffree-form} %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
+    f951 %|.f95 %{!ffixed-form:-ffree-form} %(cc1_options) \
+    %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-format-
zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
+    %{J*} %{I*}\
        "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
        %(llvm_options) \
        -fpreprocessed %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:% 
(invoke_as)}}}}", 0, 0, 0},
  {".f90", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
  {".f95", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
  {".f03", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
-{"@f95", "%{!E:f951 %i %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
+{"@f95", "%{!E:f951 %i %(cc1_options) \
+         %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-
format-zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
+         %{J*} %{I*}\
           "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
           %(llvm_options) \
           %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:%(invoke_as)}}",  
0, 0, 0},
  {".f",   "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
  {".for", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
  {".FOR", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
-{"@f77", "%{!E:f951 %i %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form}
%(cc1_options) %
{J*} %{I*}\
+{"@f77", "%{!E:f951 %i %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form}
%(cc1_options) \
+         %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-
format-zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
+         %{J*} %{I*}\
           "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
           %(llvm_options) \
           %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:%(invoke_as)}}",  
0, 0, 0},

Mike Stump

2008-Oct-31 18:07 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

On Oct 31, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Devang Patel wrote:>>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid
for C/C++/
>>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
> Try this not so elegant and untested patch.
I'd not expect this to work for Ada, java or Pascal.

Devang Patel

2008-Oct-31 18:13 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

On Oct 31, 2008, at 11:07 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
>>>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is
valid for C/C++/
>>>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>
>> Try this not so elegant and untested patch.
>
> I'd not expect this to work for Ada, java or Pascal.
It is obvious, I know. I encourage you to provide a better patch.
-
Devang

Jack Howarth

2008-Nov-01 00:02 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:44:36AM -0700, Devang Patel
wrote:>
> On Oct 30, 2008, at 11:02 PM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>> On Oct 30, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jack Howarth wrote:
>>> ps We do have one oddity left in llvm-gfortran from current llvm
>>> svn. I find everytime I compile something with llvm-gfortran that
>>> I get a series of warning messages...
>>>
>>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat" is valid
for C/C++/
>>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wformat-security" is
valid for
>>> C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>> f951: warning: command line option
"-Wno-format-extra-args" is valid
>>> for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>> f951: warning: command line option
"-Wno-format-zero-length" is
>>> valid for C/C++/ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>> f951: warning: command line option "-Wno-nonnull" is
valid for C/C++/
>>> ObjC/ObjC++ but not for Fortran
>>>
>>> Is this something we can suppress easily for the 2.4 release?
>
>
> Jack,
>
> Try this not so elegant and untested patch.
> -
> Devang
>
>
> Index: lang-specs.h
> ==================================================================> ---
lang-specs.h	(revision 57986)
> +++ lang-specs.h	(working copy)
> @@ -14,7 +14,9 @@
>    "cc1 -E -lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN % 
> (cpp_options) \
>        %{E|M|MM:%(cpp_debug_options)}\
>        %{!M:%{!MM:%{!E: -o %|.f |\n\
> -    f951 %|.f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
> +    f951 %|.f %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form} %(cc1_options) \
> +    %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-format-
> zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
> +    %{J*} %{I*}\
>        "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
>        %(llvm_options) \
>        -fpreprocessed %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:% 
> (invoke_as)}}}}", 0, 0, 0},
> @@ -25,21 +27,27 @@
>    "cc1 -E -lang-fortran -traditional-cpp -D_LANGUAGE_FORTRAN % 
> (cpp_options) \
>        %{E|M|MM:%(cpp_debug_options)}\
>        %{!M:%{!MM:%{!E: -o %|.f95 |\n\
> -    f951 %|.f95 %{!ffixed-form:-ffree-form} %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
> +    f951 %|.f95 %{!ffixed-form:-ffree-form} %(cc1_options) \
> +    %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-format-
> zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
> +    %{J*} %{I*}\
>        "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
>        %(llvm_options) \
>        -fpreprocessed %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:% 
> (invoke_as)}}}}", 0, 0, 0},
>  {".f90", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
>  {".f95", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
>  {".f03", "@f95", 0, 0, 0},
> -{"@f95", "%{!E:f951 %i %(cc1_options) %{J*} %{I*}\
> +{"@f95", "%{!E:f951 %i %(cc1_options) \
> +         %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-
> format-zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
> +         %{J*} %{I*}\
>           "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
>           %(llvm_options) \
>           %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:%(invoke_as)}}",
0,
> 0, 0},
>  {".f",   "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
>  {".for", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
>  {".FOR", "@f77", 0, 0, 0},
> -{"@f77", "%{!E:f951 %i %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form}
%(cc1_options) %{J*}
> %{I*}\
> +{"@f77", "%{!E:f951 %i %{!ffree-form:-ffixed-form}
%(cc1_options) \
> +         %<Wformat %<Wformat-security %<Wno-format-extra-args
%<Wno-
> format-zero-length %<Wno-nonull \
> +         %{J*} %{I*}\
>           "/* LLVM LOCAL */" \
>           %(llvm_options) \
>           %{!nostdinc:-I finclude%s} %{!fsyntax-only:%(invoke_as)}}",
0,
> 0, 0},
>
Devang,
    The patch isn't suppressing the errors.
                Jack

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more apparently analagous threads

llvm dev - Oct 2008 - [LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

[LLVMdev] gfortran link failure in current llvm svn

Possibly Parallel Threads