search for: gfortran

The current llvm/llvm-gcc4.2 svn is now fixed with respect to the extra warnings that were being emitted by the gfortran compiler. The gfortran testsuite results under Intel Darwin9 are appended below. Jack Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90...

Using the proposed patch for enabling the i386 multilib under the x86_64-apple-darwin build... http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2009-August/025040.html the following gfortran testsuite results are obtained... Native configuration is x86_64-apple-darwin10 === gfortran tests === Running target unix/-m32 FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors) FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_charlen_...

Building llvm 2.3 and llvm-gcc4.2-2.3 on Mac OS X 10.5, I am seeing the following failures remaining in the gcc 4.2.1 gfortran testsuite... LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O1 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructor_1.f90 -O2 execution test FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_construc...

...lt;mlong-branch %<mlongcall %<mcpu=G4 %<mcpu=G5 \ - "/* APPLE LOCAL enable format security warnings */"\ - %{!Wno-format:-Wformat -Wformat-security} \ %{g: %{!fno-eliminate-unused-debug-symbols: -feliminate-unused-debug-symbols }}" /* APPLE LOCAL AltiVec */ to allow gfortran to build and compile without extra warnings produces the appended gfortran testsuite results. LAST_UPDATED: Native configuration is i686-apple-darwin9 === gfortran tests === Running target unix FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/aint_anint_1.f...

...wnloaded 458 Kb trying URL 'http://cran.at.r-project.org/src/contrib/fields_6.01.tar.gz' Content type 'application/x-gzip' length 3670039 bytes (3.5 Mb) opened URL ================================================== downloaded 3.5 Mb * Installing *source* package ‘spam’ ... ** libs gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c bckslvmodified.f -o bckslvmodified.o gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c cholmodified.f -o cholmodified.o gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c dist.f -o dist.o gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c fromsparsekit.f -o fromsparsekit.o gfortran -fpic -g -O2 -c kronecker.f -o kronecker.o gfortran -fpic -...

Hi, in trying to build an llvm-gfortran on linux from today's gcc4 SVN, I get the following link errors that didn't show up on OS X. This is also using LLVM CVS from this morning. They appear to mostly be related to CodeWarrior compatibility code, but a couple are less obvious. What's the best way to fix this? I'm stuck...

Anton, With regard to the gfortran test cases which don't fail on x86_64 Linux, these are the exact gfortran.log entries for them under i686 Darwin9... > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (internal compiler error) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/array_constructor_12.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) Executing on hos...

Hello folks, I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing error. Error message is m_List.F90: In function 'exporttostring_': m_List.F90:925: error: conversion to non-scalar type requested I wonde...

On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > You wrote: > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > >> all, > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1? No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of junk). Gfortran in gcc 4.1 was the first...

I?d like to solicit some advice on a debugging problem I have in the quantreg package. Kurt and Brian have reported to me that on Debian machines with gfortran 9 library(quantreg) f = summary(rq(foodexp ~ income, data = engel, tau = 1:4/5)) plot(f) fails because summary() produces bogus estimates of the coefficient bounds. This example has been around in my R package from the earliest days of R, and before that in various incarnations of S. The culprit...

...even Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > > You wrote: > > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > > >> all, > > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > > > > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1? > > > > No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly exp...

The previously posted benchnarks for gcc vs llvm-gfortran had one mistake. I was actually had the gfortran for 4.3.1 installed instead of that from gcc 4.2.4. Below are the polyhedron benchmark results for all three compilers... gfortran 4.2.4 Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repea...

On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Sep 2006, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > You wrote: > > >> The NIST F77 test suite doesn't seem to be compatible with gfortran at > > >> all, > > > Actually, the entire suite compiles flawlessly with gfortran. > > > See http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GFortranResults > > > > Was that true of GCC 4.0.1? > > No, gfortran in gcc 4.0 is, ehm, highly experimental (read: a piece of > ju...

We're finding that several of the packages we need don't compile using the version 4.1.2 of gfortran that comes with CentOS 5.4. So, I've built the latest version of gfortran (e.g. 4.4.2) but I've done it so that all the new version's files go in /share/apps/gnu so that they don't interfere with the standard gcc distribution (building gfortran requires building some parts of gcc)....

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Yuanfang Chen <tabloid.adroit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello folks, > I want to compile some fortran code to IR, but llvm-gfortran 4.2-2.9 does > compile my fortran code. gfortran 4.2.1 fail with the same error. but > gfortran 4.4.6 and ifort compiles fine. Attached is the file causing > error. Error message is > m_List.F90: In function 'exporttostring_': > m_List.F90:925: error: conversion to non-scalar...

Another option might be g95 instead of gfortran. I haven't used it for a while, but I seem to recall it working fine in gcc 4.0.1. On 9/11/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/9/06, Michael McCracken <michael.mccracken at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/9/06, Steven Bosscher <stevenb.gcc at...

...ded R version 2.11.1 and extracted the files into my home directory. I realize I need a FORTRAN compiler to help with this process and have tried installing a few but still cannot past the configuration step of installing R: ./configure --with-readline=no Once I run this command after installing GFortran I get the following error: ... checking whether we can compute C Make dependencies... yes, using gcc -std=gnu99 -MM checking whether gcc -std=gnu99 supports -c -o FILE.lo... yes checking how to get verbose linking output from gfortran... configure: WARNING: compilation failed checking for Fortran...

Hello, gfortran-4.4 is not in the synaptic package manager. Effort to search for it on the web is not fruitful. I tried to install gcc-4.4 in place of it. That does not solve my problem either. Another machine that has gfortran-4.4 runs my code without error. Attempt to run the same code with gcc-4.4 failed. I equ...

I've benchmarked the llvm 2.3/llvm-gcc-4.2 release against the stock gfortran compiler from gcc 4.2.4 on a 2.33GHz MacBook Pro using the '-ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3' optimization flags. llvm-gfortran Benchmark Compile Executable Ave Run Number Estim Name (secs) (bytes) (secs) Repeats Err % --------- ------- ----------...

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006, Michael McCracken wrote: > Hi, in a thread this afternoon about compiling the Fortran SPEC2000 to > LLVM bytecode, Chris mentioned that it should be possible to compile > to LLVM with the gfortran front end, although no one has necessarily > tried it. Yup. > I was surprised (and happy) to hear this, as under the impression that > it would require a "complete rewrite of the gfortran backend" [1]. Now, > I probably misinterpreted that exchange, but it was the only pub...