Hello, I have an intrinsic that matches to a asm instruction directly. This intrinsic starts a coprocessor that can do anything. If I put another instruction next to it (a multiplication for example), the "llc" reorders and puts the intrinsic after the multiplication. I have tried all: - Setting the instruction like if it takes 256 cycles or 0 cycles. - Setting the instruction with "hasSideEffects" (which is ignored I think) - Setting the instruction as a load, branch, call, etc.... - .... These later things are ignored, I don't know if when the intrinsic is lowered, then it doesn't matter (or perhaps the reorder is made before). Any clues? Thanks. Julio -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080914/e2df53f8/attachment.html>
Hello, Julio> These later things are ignored, I don't know if when the intrinsic is > lowered, then it doesn't matter (or perhaps the reorder is made > before).What is the description of the instruction you're lowering intrinsic into? Have you looked for the instruction flags defined in Target.td file? You instruction should definitely have "isBarrier" flag set. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.
Nothing... I'll show you all the info related to: The intrinsic: def int_soru_sre : Intrinsic<[llvm_void_ty, llvm_i32_ty], [IntrWriteMem]>; The lower instruction (in MIPS): class SORUI<bits<6> op, dag outs, dag ins, string asmstr, list<dag> pattern, InstrItinClass itin>: FI<op, outs, ins, asmstr, pattern, itin> { let isBarrier = 1; // or call, hassideefects, ..., nothing work } def SORU_SRE: SORUI<0b110011, (outs), (ins uimm16:$imm), "sre $imm", [(int_soru_sre imm:$imm)], IISoru>; (With IISoru I made all the possible changes: a lot of cycles or none with all the functional units or none) And an example: tail call void @llvm.soru.sre( i32 5 ) mul i32 %b, %a ; <i32>:0 [#uses=1] is coded as: mult $2, $5, $4 sre 5 Best regards. Julio 2008/9/14 Anton Korobeynikov <asl at math.spbu.ru>> Hello, Julio > > > These later things are ignored, I don't know if when the intrinsic is > > lowered, then it doesn't matter (or perhaps the reorder is made > > before). > What is the description of the instruction you're lowering intrinsic > into? Have you looked for the instruction flags defined in Target.td > file? You instruction should definitely have "isBarrier" flag set. > > -- > With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. > > Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University. > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080915/5140bf01/attachment.html>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Julio <julio.martin.hidalgo at gmail.com> wrote:> Hello, I have an intrinsic that matches to a asm instruction directly. This > intrinsic starts a coprocessor that can do anything. > > If I put another instruction next to it (a multiplication for example), the > "llc" reorders and puts the intrinsic after the multiplication. > > I have tried all: > - Setting the instruction like if it takes 256 cycles or 0 cycles. > - Setting the instruction with "hasSideEffects" (which is ignored I think) > - Setting the instruction as a load, branch, call, etc.... > - .... > > These later things are ignored, I don't know if when the intrinsic is > lowered, then it doesn't matter (or perhaps the reorder is made before). > > Any clues?Does your instruction have a flag output? Andrew
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Prevent a intrinsic to be reordered?
- [LLVMdev] Prevent a intrinsic to be reordered?
- Should intrinsics llvm.eh.sjlj.setjmp be with isBarrier flag?
- How to add a barrier pseudo instruction?
- [LLVMdev] How basic block layout is determined during scheduling?