llvm dev - Apr 2008 - [LLVMdev] LLVMBuilder vs LLVMFoldingBuilder

> Please find _attached_ the update patches with all requested changes.
Applied - thanks!

Ciao,

Duncan.

On Apr 12, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>> Please find _attached_ the update patches with all requested changes.
>
> Applied - thanks!
>
In the future, can all major API changes please be checked in after  
giving some warning to the community? For example, send a separate  
email title "API Change" and then give some sort of warning as to when
it will go in the tree. This is a major API change and not everyone is  
going to read these treads in depth.

There are many projects that do NOT live in llvm svn for whatever  
reason and these projects have their own testers that use TOT of  
llvm.  Checking something this major disrupts these outside testers.  
Its especially painful when things get checked in on a weekend without  
warning and its harder to get a quick response to update outside  
projects.

Thanks,
Tanya


> Ciao,
>
> Duncan.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Tanya Lattner wrote:
> On Apr 12, 2008, at 11:28 PM, Duncan Sands wrote:
>
>   
>>> Please find _attached_ the update patches with all requested
changes.
>>>       
>> Applied - thanks!
>>
>>     
>
> In the future, can all major API changes please be checked in after  
> giving some warning to the community? For example, send a separate  
> email title "API Change" and then give some sort of warning as to
when
> it will go in the tree. This is a major API change and not everyone is  
> going to read these treads in depth.
>   
Apologies. I'd assumed with the conversation in this thread going on for 
some time that there was adequate warning for the API change.

I'll make sure with future changes to make the subject more explicit.

Thanks
Dominic