llvm dev - Mar 2008 - [LLVMdev] llvm/test: suffix or operands invalid for `push'

Hi all again,

llvm is failing the 2006-11-30-NoCompileUnit and 2006-11-30-Pubnames
tests on me.
-m32 and --disable-multilib didn't change the outcome. Did I get the
command wrong? I tried

  jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ CFLAGS=--multilib make check

See below for a transcript of the failed check.

What next?

Regards,
Jo

-- snip --
jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$ make check
llvm[0]: Running test suite
make[1]: Betrete Verzeichnis '/home/jo/Delta/llvm/test'
( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; \

PATH="/home/jo/Delta/llvm/Debug/bin:/home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Scripts:/home/jo/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games"
\
          /usr/bin/runtest --ignore "llvm2cpp.exp ocaml.exp" )
WARNING: No tool specified
Test Run By jo on Wed Feb 27 10:02:12 2008
Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

                ===  tests ==
Schedule of variations:
    unix

Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file
for target.
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for
target.
WARNING: Couldn't find tool config file for unix, using default.
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/Andersens/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/BasicAA/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/Dominators/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/GlobalsModRef/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/LoadVN/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/LoopInfo/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Analysis/ScalarEvolution/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Archive/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Assembler/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Bitcode/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/BugPoint/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/C++Frontend/dg.exp ...
FAIL: /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/C++Frontend/2006-11-30-NoCompileUnit.cpp
Failed with exit(1) at line 2
while running: as NoCompileUnit.s -o NoCompileUnit.o
NoCompileUnit.s: Assembler messages:
NoCompileUnit.s:33: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:52: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
NoCompileUnit.s:64: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:83: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
NoCompileUnit.s:95: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:116: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
NoCompileUnit.s:128: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:225: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
NoCompileUnit.s:237: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:243: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `push'
NoCompileUnit.s:268: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'
NoCompileUnit.s:269: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `pop'

FAIL: /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/C++Frontend/2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp
Failed with exit(1) at line 2
while running: as 2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp.tmp.s -o
2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp.tmp.o
2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp.tmp.s: Assembler messages:
2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp.tmp.s:33: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
`push'
2006-11-30-Pubnames.cpp.tmp.s:55: Error: suffix or operands invalid for
`pop'

Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CFrontend/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/Alpha/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/CBackend/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/CellSPU/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/GC/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/IA64/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/SPARC/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/DebugInfo/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/ExecutionEngine/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Feature/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/FrontendAda/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/FrontendObjC/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Integer/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Linker/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Other/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/TableGen/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/ADCE/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/ArgumentPromotion/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/BlockPlacement/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/CodeExtractor/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/CondProp/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/ConstProp/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/ConstantMerge/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/CorrelatedExprs/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/DeadArgElim/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/DeadStoreElimination/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/DecomposeMultiDimRefs/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/GCSE/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/GVN/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/GVNPRE/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/GlobalDCE/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/IPConstantProp/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/IndVarsSimplify/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/Inline/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/InstCombine/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LCSSA/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LICM/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopIndexSplit/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopRotate/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopSimplify/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnroll/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LoopUnswitch/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerInvoke/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSetJmp/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/LowerSwitch/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/Mem2Reg/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/PredicateSimplifier/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/PruneEH/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/RaiseAllocations/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/Reassociate/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/SCCP/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/ScalarRepl/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyCFG/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/SimplifyLibCalls/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/StripSymbols/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/TailCallElim/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Transforms/TailDup/dg.exp ...
Running /home/jo/Delta/llvm/test/Verifier/dg.exp ...

                ===  Summary ==
# of expected passes            2518
# of unexpected failures        2
# of expected failures          7
make[1]: *** [check-local] Fehler 1
make[1]: Verlasse Verzeichnis '/home/jo/Delta/llvm/test'
make: *** [check] Fehler 2
jo at kurier:~/Delta/llvm/test$

Some additional info:

I just found the .s files mentioned in the error message, and checked
them. All error messages refer to one of the following four
instructions:
  pushl %ebp
  pushl %esi
  popl %ebp
  popl %esi
It's always the same error, "suffix or operands invalid for
`push'" (resp `pop').

There are no other push or pop instructions in any .s file.
2006-11-06-StackTrace is not listed during testing, and generates no
error messages. All other .s files with pushl or popl are listed during
testing and fail with the above-mentioned error message.

Again: What should I try next?

Regards,
Jo

On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Some additional info:
>
> I just found the .s files mentioned in the error message, and checked
> them. All error messages refer to one of the following four
> instructions:
>  pushl %ebp
>  pushl %esi
>  popl %ebp
>  popl %esi
> It's always the same error, "suffix or operands invalid for
> `push'" (resp `pop').
Those are valid instructions in every x86-32 assembler I'm aware of.   
Perhaps it needs a switch to put it in 32-bit mode?
Perhaps it is not parsing tab characters?
> There are no other push or pop instructions in any .s file.
> 2006-11-06-StackTrace is not listed during testing, and generates no
> error messages. All other .s files with pushl or popl are listed  
> during
> testing and fail with the above-mentioned error message.
>
> Again: What should I try next?
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Hi all,

I found enough to explain the behaviour that I encountered. If I'm
correct, the bugs are just in the dejagnu-based test machinery, not in
LLVM itself.
There seem to be two issues:


Issue 1 is that the CC, CFLAGS, CXX, and CXXFLAGS settings are not
reflected in the site.exp file. I had
 CC=gcc-4.2
 CFLAGS="-m32 -Wl,-melf_i386"
 CXX=g++-4.2
 CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
 ARCH=i686-pc-linux-gnu
 ./configure --prefix=$HOME --target=$ARCH --host=$ARCH --build=$ARCH
but site.exp still has
  set gccpath "gcc"
  set gxxpath "g++"
and no mention of -m32 or -Wl,elf_i386 (these options are required to
force a 64-bit GNU toolchain into 32-bit mode).

I don't know where these options are lost; I did a little looking around
in the configure scripts, but didn't find any obvious problems and
decided to leave this kind of issue to the autoconf experts :-)


Issue 2 is that the RUN: lines in the dejagnu tests ignore $CC, $CXX,
$CFLAGS and $CXXFLAGS when calling gcc, g++, or as (and possibly ld). In
most cases things will happen to not fail, but the assembler choked on
32-bit opcodes when running in default mode (which is 64 bits on an
amd64 machine, of course).

If I'm correct, this is a bug in the tests, not in LLVM.
Proposed bug fix would then be to replace in all test case files
(hopefully I got the dejagnu macro syntax right):
  gcc -> %gccpath
  g++ -> %gxxpath
  as -> %gccpath (don't call 'as' directly, gcc knows how to call
it!)
  ld -> %gccpath (just as with 'as')


Can anybody confirm or correct these findings?

Regards,
Jo

On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I found enough to explain the behaviour that I encountered. If I'm
> correct, the bugs are just in the dejagnu-based test machinery, not in
> LLVM itself.
Yep, I believe that.  I haven't been following the whole thread very  
closely, what specific tests are affected here?

Before making any significant and widespread changes to llvm/test,  
please change one test and propose it as a model for other tests.

Thanks for working on this!

-Chris
>
> There seem to be two issues:
>
>
> Issue 1 is that the CC, CFLAGS, CXX, and CXXFLAGS settings are not
> reflected in the site.exp file. I had
> CC=gcc-4.2
> CFLAGS="-m32 -Wl,-melf_i386"
> CXX=g++-4.2
> CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
> ARCH=i686-pc-linux-gnu
> ./configure --prefix=$HOME --target=$ARCH --host=$ARCH --build=$ARCH
> but site.exp still has
>  set gccpath "gcc"
>  set gxxpath "g++"
> and no mention of -m32 or -Wl,elf_i386 (these options are required to
> force a 64-bit GNU toolchain into 32-bit mode).
>
> I don't know where these options are lost; I did a little looking  
> around
> in the configure scripts, but didn't find any obvious problems and
> decided to leave this kind of issue to the autoconf experts :-)
>
>
> Issue 2 is that the RUN: lines in the dejagnu tests ignore $CC, $CXX,
> $CFLAGS and $CXXFLAGS when calling gcc, g++, or as (and possibly  
> ld). In
> most cases things will happen to not fail, but the assembler choked on
> 32-bit opcodes when running in default mode (which is 64 bits on an
> amd64 machine, of course).
>
> If I'm correct, this is a bug in the tests, not in LLVM.
> Proposed bug fix would then be to replace in all test case files
> (hopefully I got the dejagnu macro syntax right):
>  gcc -> %gccpath
>  g++ -> %gxxpath
>  as -> %gccpath (don't call 'as' directly, gcc knows how to
call it!)
>  ld -> %gccpath (just as with 'as')
>
>
> Can anybody confirm or correct these findings?
>
> Regards,
> Jo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev