search for: durchholz

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Am 19.10.2015 um 19:40 schrieb Daniel Berlin: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> Am 19.10.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Chris Lattner via llvm-d...

Am Mittwoch, den 05.03.2008, 23:03 -0800 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I found enough to explain the behaviour that I encountered. If I'm > > correct, the bugs are just in the dejagnu-based test machinery, not in > > LLVM itself. > > Yep, I believe that. I haven't been following the whole t...

Bill Wendling wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > >> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >> >>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is >>> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if proper...

On Mar 3, 2008, at 2:49 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Hi all, > > I found enough to explain the behaviour that I encountered. If I'm > correct, the bugs are just in the dejagnu-based test machinery, not in > LLVM itself. Yep, I believe that. I haven't been following the whole thread very closely, what specific test...

On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: >> >>> >>> Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >>>> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim D...

On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: >>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is >>> >>> --prefix=/home/jo --enable-optimized --build=i686-pc-linux...

Am 01.11.2011 05:59, schrieb Marc J. Driftmeyer: > Then this complaint about build times and extra CPU cycles when you're > living in a world of systems soon to average 16GB of RAM, 4-12 cores and > GPUs that would make any old Animator dream back in the '90s really > makes me laugh. Not disagreeing about the rest, but here I have to. In today's projects, full rebuilds

Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 10:28 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >>> Look at how $LLVM_CONFIGURE is built, the final value is > >>> > >>> --prefix=/home/jo --ena...

Hi all, I'm wondering what the comparative status of llvm-gcc4.0 vs. llvm-gcc4.2 is. Can anybody tell? (A URL would be fine, I may have been just too dumb to find it.) Regards, Jo

Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> writes: > On the reasons why make-based builds are slow, Peter Miller has some > insight to offer: > http://miller.emu.id.au/pmiller/books/rmch/ . > I'm not sure how widely recognized that paper is. Maybe it's widely > known and today's buil...

I've been tossing around some ideas about high-level backends. Say, have LLVM emit Perl code. Sounds whacky but isn't. It's good for the first bootstrapping phase in environments where you don't have a C compiler, where you don't have a cross-compiled binary for download, but you can execute Perl. It also makes a great inspect-the-sources-with-an-editor stage for aspiring

Am Freitag, den 04.04.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Chris Lattner: > On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> No, please don't do this. The idea of llvmbuilder is that it is a > >> "free" wrapper around the other existing API calls. Making the > >> methods virtual would make them much more expensive. > > > > Wouldn't the class of the ob...

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Am 19.10.2015 um 17:25 schrieb Chris Lattner via llvm-dev: >> >> Unfortunately, adding the Apache CLA also has several disadvantages >> as well: >> >> - It adds new barriers for new contributors to LLVM. We d...

On May 14, 2008, at 4:46 AM, Dominic Hamon wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: >> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz >> <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: >> >>> Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >>> >>>> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what >>>> exactly is >>>> LLVM's autoconf doing that...

Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 11:50 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > > > > Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: > >> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is > >> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if properly set up...

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >> Sorry to step into this in the middle of a thread, but what exactly is >> LLVM's autoconf doing that "autoconf shouldn't do if properly set up"? > > 1)...

On Feb 27, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > Some additional info: > > I just found the .s files mentioned in the error message, and checked > them. All error messages refer to one of the following four > instructions: > pushl %ebp > pushl %esi > popl %ebp > popl %esi > It's always the same erro...

Am Montag, den 31.03.2008, 00:02 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > On Mar 30, 2008, at 11:22 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > > > Am Sonntag, den 30.03.2008, 15:45 -0700 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > >> On Mar 30, 2008, at 12:39 PM, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > >> > >>> OK, I now have > >>> > >>> LLVM_VERSION_INFO=kurier-bootstrap /home/jo/llvm-gcc-src/conf...

...ally make the change you want. It's a right pain to work with such systems too, even if it may seem like a good idea at times. Most importantly, it is often harming innovation and improvements, because of the bureaucracy involved in making changes. -- Mats On 13 October 2015 at 12:40, Joachim Durchholz via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks, that answered all questions. > > One last detail: What's a major version? 3.8 or 4.0? > > Regards, > Jo > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev...

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: > > Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 11:50 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: >> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Joachim Durchholz <jo at durchholz.org> wrote: >> > >> > Am Dienstag, den 13.05.2008, 00:42 -0700 schrieb Bill Wendling: &gt...