On Mon, 2 Jul 2007, Peter Wiedermann wrote:> i was working on an llvm-gcc4_2 version, which i used as a starting-point
for
> a fixed-point c-datatype implementation.
> i read that the svn repos is up now, and so i remembered the following
lines:
>
>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Peter Wiedermann wrote:
>>> i fixed some major bugs in the llvm-gcc4_2 patch since my last
post.
>>> this brings me to an interesting question:
>>>
>>> what are your criteria to use my patch for further development?
>>
>> I have no fixed criteria. I think the best solution is for the work to
be
>> checked into the (forthcoming) public SVN server. When it is available,
>> you can check it in there ...
>
> so if you still want to use my llvm-gcc4.2 as a base for further
development,
> i am prepared ;)
Great, svn is set up now, so you should be able to import your bits into
it. (please talk to Anton or Reid for details).
Did you base your 4.2 work on apple's gcc 4.2 or on fsf gcc 4.2? My
memory is fuzzy :)
> ps.: i could provide a failure-stat of the llvm-test suite, so
> you could estimate how much/where problems have to be fixed.
Cool, are programs basically compiling and working?
-Chris
--
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/