> > i was working on an llvm-gcc4_2 version, which i used as a
starting-point for
> > a fixed-point c-datatype implementation.
> > i read that the svn repos is up now, and so i remembered the
following lines:
> >
> >> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Peter Wiedermann wrote:
> >>> i fixed some major bugs in the llvm-gcc4_2 patch since my last
post.
> >>> this brings me to an interesting question:
> >>>
> >>> what are your criteria to use my patch for further
development?
> >>
> >> I have no fixed criteria. I think the best solution is for the
work to be
> >> checked into the (forthcoming) public SVN server. When it is
available,
> >> you can check it in there ...
> >
> > so if you still want to use my llvm-gcc4.2 as a base for further
development,
> > i am prepared ;)
>
> Great, svn is set up now, so you should be able to import your bits into
> it. (please talk to Anton or Reid for details).
>
ok
> Did you base your 4.2 work on apple's gcc 4.2 or on fsf gcc 4.2? My
> memory is fuzzy :)
>
fsf gcc4.2
> > ps.: i could provide a failure-stat of the llvm-test suite, so
> > you could estimate how much/where problems have to be fixed.
>
> Cool, are programs basically compiling and working?
>
yes.
for a detailed llvm-gcc4 to llvm-gcc4.2 failure comparison see:
http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/llvm-gcc4_2_stat.ps.gz
or
http://geldspeicher.entenhausen.at/dl/llvm-gcc4_2_stat.pdf
kind regards
peter