Anton Vayvod
2006-Aug-16 16:01 UTC
[LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
Thanks, Reid. I've found that some overrides of allocation_order_begin() calls MachineFunction getInfo method. this method is not const. However, I think there could be default const implementation (const_cast of non-const method) and then allocation_order_begin() could be const. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060816/4109a977/attachment.html>
Chris Lattner
2006-Aug-16 17:00 UTC
[LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Anton Vayvod wrote:> Thanks, Reid. > I've found that some overrides of allocation_order_begin() calls > MachineFunction getInfo method. this method is not const. However, I think > there could be default const implementation (const_cast of non-const method) > and then allocation_order_begin() could be const.That sounds reasonable to me. There should probably also be a const version of the getInfo method. If you'd be willing to put together a patch, we can get it fixed. Thanks, -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
Anton Vayvod
2006-Aug-16 17:15 UTC
[LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
I'm willing :) I don't know how to do it. What's "to put together a patch"? :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20060816/fb1f0b57/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
- [LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
- [LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
- [LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction
- [LLVMdev] allocation_order_begin takes non-const reference for MachineFunction