llvm dev - Jul 2004 - [LLVMdev] Propose change gnuplot options for small picture versions

In current state dates at small version of pictures generated by night
builder script is unreadable
( for example http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/running_loc.png ).


I suggest rotate it to vertical position in small picture versions.

.png file created modified gnuplot script (for comparing) and patch
attached.

"set xlabel 0,-1 " added for solving xlabel and xtics text overlap
after
rotate.

Vladimir

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: running_loc.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4436 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040705/b3db39ad/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NightlyTest.gnuplot.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3786 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040705/b3db39ad/attachment.obj>

Vladimir,

That looks great. I'll patch this shortly.

Thanks very much.

Reid.

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 11:45, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In current state dates at small version of pictures generated by night
> builder script is unreadable
> ( for example http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/running_loc.png ).
> 
> 
> I suggest rotate it to vertical position in small picture versions.
> 
> .png file created modified gnuplot script (for comparing) and patch
> attached.
> 
> "set xlabel 0,-1 " added for solving xlabel and xtics text
overlap after
> rotate.
> 
> Vladimir
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040705/133c4df9/attachment.sig>

> Change the "rotate by 90" xtics specification to just
"rotate" which is
> equivalent. The "by <angle>" syntax is not acceptable for
all output
> devices. Apparently the Sparc and x86 output devices (no color) don't 
> accept this, but should accept the plain "rotate".
Sorry, i must be more careful if i proposed patches. 

Vladimir

Vladimir,

Thanks for the offer of dilligence, but there's not much you could have done
unless you had Sparc, PPC, and Linux x86 systems to try it on. In general, 
patches that work on one platform but break on alternate platforms are 
relatively easily forgiven because none of us outside UIUC have multiple 
machines to test on.

So, don't worry about it .. not like you broke a major piece of LLVM, just 
the nightly tester :)

Reid.

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 21:17:28 +0400
  "Vladimir Merzliakov" <wanderer at rsu.ru>
wrote:
>> Change the "rotate by 90" xtics specification to just
"rotate" which is
>> equivalent. The "by <angle>" syntax is not acceptable
for all output
>> devices. Apparently the Sparc and x86 output devices (no color)
don't
>> accept this, but should accept the plain "rotate".
> 
> Sorry, i must be more careful if i proposed patches. 
> 
> Vladimir
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev