thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform [Jun 2004]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Vladimir Merzliakov

2004-Jun-21 07:15 UTC

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
mail list?

Now results.
Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.

New regressions:
  Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
  Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
expected PASS
  Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
  Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
expected PASS

Full log attached.

--- 
STATISTICS ---------------------------------------------------------------

     920        tests total
     856 ( 93%) tests as expected
       6 (  1%) tests unexpected FAIL
      58 (  6%) tests unexpected PASS

--- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED
OUTCOMES -------------------------------------------

  Feature.mc.basictest                          : XPASS

  Feature.mc.calltest                           : XPASS

  Feature.mc.casttest                           : XPASS

  Feature.mc.cfgstructures                      : XPASS

  Feature.mc.constexpr                          : XPASS

  Feature.mc.constexprbad                       : XPASS

  Feature.mc.constpointer                       : XPASS

  Feature.mc.forwardreftest                     : XPASS

  Feature.mc.globalvars                         : XPASS

  Feature.mc.indirectcall                       : XPASS

  Feature.mc.indirectcall2                      : XPASS

  Feature.mc.properties                         : XPASS

  Feature.mc.prototype                          : XPASS

  Feature.mc.recursivetype                      : XPASS

  Feature.mc.simplecalltest                     : XPASS

  Feature.mc.small                              : XPASS

  Feature.mc.smallest                           : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testalloca                         : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testconstants                      : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testlogical                        : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testmemory                         : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testswitch                         : XPASS

  Feature.mc.testvarargs                        : XPASS

  Feature.mc.varargs                            : XPASS

  Feature.mc.weirdnames                         : XPASS

  Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
    Script:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
ript.ConstantExprFold.llx
    Output:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
ript.ConstantExprFold.llx.out

  Regression.C++Frontend.2003-08-28-ForwardType : XPASS

  Regression.C++Frontend.2003-09-30-ForIncrementExprBug2: XPASS

  Regression.CFrontend.2003-01-30-UnionInit     : FAIL    , expected PASS
    Compiling C code failed

  Regression.CFrontend.2003-06-29-MultipleFunctionDefinition: XPASS

  Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-AggregateInitializer: FAIL    , expected
PASS
    Compiling C code failed

  Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-LargeIntegerBitfieldMember: XPASS

  Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
expected PASS
    Script:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx
    Output:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx.out

  Regression.LLC.2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType: XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment: XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-phifcmpd            : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb    : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-usefsubasbool       : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-28-ManyArgs            : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP          : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi     : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-07-06-BadIntCmp           : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-07-07-BadLongConst        : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-07-08-BadCastToBool       : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte       : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.BurgBadRegAlloc                : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.badCallArgLRLLVM               : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.badFoldGEP                     : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.badarg6                        : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.badlive                        : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.constindices                   : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.fwdtwice                       : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.negintconst                    : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.sched                          : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.select                         : XPASS

  Regression.LLC.spillccr                       : XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.2002-10-03-PHIPropogate: XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.whet    : XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.IndVarsSimplify.2003-09-23-NotAtTop: XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.Inline.alloca_test      : XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist: XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist: XPASS

  Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
    Script:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
ictest.ll
    Output:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
ictest.ll.out

  Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
expected PASS
    Script:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll
    Output:
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll.out

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test2004_06_21.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 82446 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040621/e96f88c3/attachment.obj>

Reid Spencer

2004-Jun-21 07:32 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

Vladimir,

We had a problem with our nightly tester (a change I introduced to
hopefully solve another problem) that caused most of the failures in
your first test. This run looks much more like what we're used to
seeing. I believe the two tests below are known problems.

Reid.

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 04:54, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:> Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
> mail list?
> 
> Now results.
> Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
> 
> New regressions:
>   Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
>   Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>   Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
>   Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
> 
> Full log attached.
> 
> --- 
> STATISTICS ---------------------------------------------------------------
> 
>      920        tests total
>      856 ( 93%) tests as expected
>        6 (  1%) tests unexpected FAIL
>       58 (  6%) tests unexpected PASS
> 
> --- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED
> OUTCOMES -------------------------------------------
> 
>   Feature.mc.basictest                          : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.calltest                           : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.casttest                           : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.cfgstructures                      : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.constexpr                          : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.constexprbad                       : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.constpointer                       : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.forwardreftest                     : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.globalvars                         : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.indirectcall                       : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.indirectcall2                      : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.properties                         : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.prototype                          : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.recursivetype                      : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.simplecalltest                     : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.small                              : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.smallest                           : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testalloca                         : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testconstants                      : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testlogical                        : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testmemory                         : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testswitch                         : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.testvarargs                        : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.varargs                            : XPASS
> 
>   Feature.mc.weirdnames                         : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
> ript.ConstantExprFold.llx
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
> ript.ConstantExprFold.llx.out
> 
>   Regression.C++Frontend.2003-08-28-ForwardType : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.C++Frontend.2003-09-30-ForIncrementExprBug2: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-01-30-UnionInit     : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Compiling C code failed
> 
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-06-29-MultipleFunctionDefinition: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-AggregateInitializer: FAIL    , expected
> PASS
>     Compiling C code failed
> 
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-LargeIntegerBitfieldMember: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
> ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
> ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx.out
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-phifcmpd            : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb    : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-usefsubasbool       : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-28-ManyArgs            : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP          : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi     : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-06-BadIntCmp           : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-07-BadLongConst        : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-08-BadCastToBool       : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte       : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.BurgBadRegAlloc                : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.badCallArgLRLLVM               : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.badFoldGEP                     : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.badarg6                        : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.badlive                        : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.constindices                   : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.fwdtwice                       : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.negintconst                    : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.sched                          : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.select                         : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.LLC.spillccr                       : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.2002-10-03-PHIPropogate: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.whet    : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.IndVarsSimplify.2003-09-23-NotAtTop: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.Inline.alloca_test      : XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist: XPASS
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
> ictest.ll
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
> ictest.ll.out
> 
>   Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
> stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
> stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll.out
> -------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040621/0c2f1eac/attachment.sig>

Chris Lattner

2004-Jun-21 07:35 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to this
> mail list?
A better list for it would be the llvmbugs list for now.

I beginning to think that we need a new test results mailing list.  We
have 3 instances of the nightly tester going now (x86/linux, sparc, ppc)
and may have more in the future.  The nightly tester spits out
notification of changes (new test failures, etc) that get sent to whoever
"owns" the tester.  It would be good of having a way of keeping track
of
these reports.

I don't really like the idea of adding yet another mailing list,
especially because few people will probably subscribe to it, but I also
don't want to spam any of the other lists too badly.

What do others think?

BTW, if you are interested in running the nightly tester on your freebsd
box, let me know and I can help you get it set up.
> Now results.
> Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
Great!  That's what we want to see.  :)
> New regressions:
>   Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
>   Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>   Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
>   Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
These should all be xfails right now, so this is ok.
>      920        tests total
>      856 ( 93%) tests as expected
>        6 (  1%) tests unexpected FAIL
>       58 (  6%) tests unexpected PASS
The 58 XPASSes are strange.  It looks like qmtest isn't expecting you to
have a working code generator, but you do.  qmtest probably needs to be
updated somehow to reflect this...

-Chris
> --- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED
> OUTCOMES -------------------------------------------
>
>   Feature.mc.basictest                          : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.calltest                           : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.casttest                           : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.cfgstructures                      : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.constexpr                          : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.constexprbad                       : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.constpointer                       : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.forwardreftest                     : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.globalvars                         : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.indirectcall                       : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.indirectcall2                      : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.properties                         : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.prototype                          : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.recursivetype                      : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.simplecalltest                     : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.small                              : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.smallest                           : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testalloca                         : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testconstants                      : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testlogical                        : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testmemory                         : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testswitch                         : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.testvarargs                        : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.varargs                            : XPASS
>
>   Feature.mc.weirdnames                         : XPASS
>
>   Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold         : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
> ript.ConstantExprFold.llx
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trConstantExprFold.llx/testsc
> ript.ConstantExprFold.llx.out
>
>   Regression.C++Frontend.2003-08-28-ForwardType : XPASS
>
>   Regression.C++Frontend.2003-09-30-ForIncrementExprBug2: XPASS
>
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-01-30-UnionInit     : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Compiling C code failed
>
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-06-29-MultipleFunctionDefinition: XPASS
>
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-AggregateInitializer: FAIL    , expected
> PASS
>     Compiling C code failed
>
>   Regression.CFrontend.2003-08-30-LargeIntegerBitfieldMember: XPASS
>
>   Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
> ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/tr2004-04-09-SameValueCoalesc
> ing.llx/testscript.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing.llx.out
>
>   Regression.LLC.2002-04-14-UnexpectedUnsignedType: XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2002-04-16-StackFrameSizeAlignment: XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-phifcmpd            : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-useboolinotherbb    : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-27-usefsubasbool       : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-28-ManyArgs            : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadFoldGEP          : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-05-30-BadPreselectPhi     : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-06-BadIntCmp           : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-07-BadLongConst        : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-08-BadCastToBool       : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.2003-07-29-BadConstSbyte       : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.BurgBadRegAlloc                : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.badCallArgLRLLVM               : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.badFoldGEP                     : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.badarg6                        : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.badlive                        : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.constindices                   : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.fwdtwice                       : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.negintconst                    : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.sched                          : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.select                         : XPASS
>
>   Regression.LLC.spillccr                       : XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.2002-10-03-PHIPropogate: XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.CorrelatedExprs.whet    : XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.IndVarsSimplify.2003-09-23-NotAtTop: XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.Inline.alloca_test      : XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstHoist: XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.LICM.2003-08-04-TrappingInstOkHoist: XPASS
>
>   Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest           : FAIL    , expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
> ictest.ll
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trbasictest.ll/testscript.bas
> ictest.ll.out
>
>   Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL    ,
> expected PASS
>     Script:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
> stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll
>     Output:
>
/usr/home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/obj/test/tmp/trtail_call_with_branch.ll/te
> stscript.tail_call_with_branch.ll.out
>
>
-Chris

-- 
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/
http://www.nondot.org/~sabre/Projects/

Vladimir Merzliakov

2004-Jun-21 09:06 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

> > Is it ok sending this results for FreeBSD5.1 at daily/weekly based to
this> > mail list?
>
> A better list for it would be the llvmbugs list for now.ok
> BTW, if you are interested in running the nightly tester on your freebsd
> box, let me know and I can help you get it set up.What i must install or have installed ?
I doesn't have root access at this machine, but admin ready to help.

Vladimir

Reid Spencer

2004-Jun-21 11:23 UTC

head link

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

On Mon, 2004-06-21 at 05:44, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I beginning to think that we need a new test results mailing list.  
> 
> What do others think?
I think its a great idea. I'd subscribe.

Reid
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040621/8670aee2/attachment.sig>

Reasonably Related Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

llvm dev - Jun 2004 - [LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform

Reasonably Related Threads