Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "ictest".
Did you mean:
ctest
2004 Jun 21
4
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
...ail list?
Now results.
Big improvement in llvm tests results from last test result sended.
New regressions:
Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL ,
expected PASS
Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL , expected PASS
Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL ,
expected PASS
Full log attached.
---
STATISTICS ---------------------------------------------------------------
920 tests total
856 ( 93%) tests as expected
6 ( 1%)...
2004 Jun 20
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
Thanks Vladimir. That's great! Glad you got it working.
BTW, the failures you're seeing have been experienced by Chris and I as
well. Chris is diligently working on making the LLVM processing more
consistent so he track down the problem. A week ago or so, these tests
passed at 100%.
Reid.
On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 15:50, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:
> In attached file.
>
> Vladimir
2004 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
In attached file.
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test2004_06_20.log
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 88488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040620/98042f01/attachment.obj>
2004 Jun 21
0
[LLVMdev] llvm test results for FreeBSD platform
...t test result sended.
Great! That's what we want to see. :)
> New regressions:
> Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS
> Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL ,
> expected PASS
> Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL , expected PASS
> Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL ,
> expected PASS
These should all be xfails right now, so this is ok.
> 920 tests total
> 856 ( 93%) tests as expected
> 6 ( 1%) tests unexpected FAIL...
2012 Oct 30
0
Checking for different hazard distributions in interval censored data
...y anything statistical about the curve shapes or hazards. I can of course just plot the survival curves and say that they look like they have different shapes, but I was hoping you lot would have a better idea.
Is there a manual way to plot the curves you get from plot(cox.zph()), perhaps using an ictest object (from the package interval)? Are there any plotting methods or tests out there in a package that would help me comment on shapes of interval censored survival curves? Can I cheat and pretend the data are not interval censored for the purposes of getting this information? (some way to say whi...