search for: tail_call_with_branch

...ult sended. New regressions: Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL , expected PASS Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL , expected PASS Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL , expected PASS Full log attached. --- STATISTICS --------------------------------------------------------------- 920 tests total 856 ( 93%) tests as expected 6 ( 1%) tests unexpected FAIL 58 ( 6%) tests unexpected PASS --- TESTS WITH UNEXPECTED OUTCOME...

Thanks Vladimir. That's great! Glad you got it working. BTW, the failures you're seeing have been experienced by Chris and I as well. Chris is diligently working on making the LLVM processing more consistent so he track down the problem. A week ago or so, these tests passed at 100%. Reid. On Sun, 2004-06-20 at 15:50, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > In attached file. > > Vladimir

In attached file. Vladimir -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: test2004_06_20.log Type: application/octet-stream Size: 88488 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040620/98042f01/attachment.obj>

...ons: > Regression.Assembler.ConstantExprFold : FAIL , expected PASS > Regression.CodeGen.Generic.2004-04-09-SameValueCoalescing: FAIL , > expected PASS > Regression.Transforms.PRE.basictest : FAIL , expected PASS > Regression.Transforms.TailCallElim.tail_call_with_branch: FAIL , > expected PASS These should all be xfails right now, so this is ok. > 920 tests total > 856 ( 93%) tests as expected > 6 ( 1%) tests unexpected FAIL > 58 ( 6%) tests unexpected PASS The 58 XPASSes are strange. It looks like qmtest isn...