Tonghao Zhang
2020-Sep-29 06:59 UTC
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the > > virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. > > > > Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > --- > > v2: > > * change the fix-tag > > --- > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +++++++- > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > index 7145c83c6c8c..21b71148c532 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = { > > VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM > > }; > > > > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \ > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \ > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) | \ > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) > > + > > I think I'd rather we open-coded this, the macro is only > used in one place ...Yes, in this patch, it is used only in one place. But in next patch [1], we use it twice and that make the code look a bit nicer. Would we open-coded this in this patch ? [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200928033915.82810-2-xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com/> > struct virtnet_stat_desc { > > char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]; > > size_t offset; > > @@ -2531,7 +2536,8 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev, > > if (features & NETIF_F_LRO) > > offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable; > > else > > - offloads = 0; > > + offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable & > > + ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK; > > > > err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads); > > if (err) > > > -- > > 2.23.0 >-- Best regards, Tonghao
Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-Sep-29 07:21 UTC
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:59:03PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote:> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the > > > virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. > > > > > > Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > --- > > > v2: > > > * change the fix-tag > > > --- > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > index 7145c83c6c8c..21b71148c532 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = { > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM > > > }; > > > > > > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \ > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \ > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) | \ > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) > > > + > > > > I think I'd rather we open-coded this, the macro is only > > used in one place ... > Yes, in this patch, it is used only in one place. But in next patch > [1], we use it twice and that make the code look a bit nicer. > Would we open-coded this in this patch ? > > [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200928033915.82810-2-xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com/OK then maybe keep this in a series like you did with v1.> > > struct virtnet_stat_desc { > > > char desc[ETH_GSTRING_LEN]; > > > size_t offset; > > > @@ -2531,7 +2536,8 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev, > > > if (features & NETIF_F_LRO) > > > offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable; > > > else > > > - offloads = 0; > > > + offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable & > > > + ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK; > > > > > > err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads); > > > if (err) > > > > > -- > > > 2.23.0 > > > > > -- > Best regards, Tonghao
Willem de Bruijn
2020-Sep-29 07:29 UTC
[PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:23 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote:> > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 02:59:03PM +0800, Tonghao Zhang wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 2:23 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:58:06AM +0800, xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com wrote: > > > > From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > > > > > Open vSwitch and Linux bridge will disable LRO of the interface > > > > when this interface added to them. Now when disable the LRO, the > > > > virtio-net csum is disable too. That drops the forwarding performance. > > > > > > > > Fixes: a02e8964eaf9 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") > > > > Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> > > > > Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> > > > > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb at google.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com> > > > > --- > > > > v2: > > > > * change the fix-tag > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 8 +++++++- > > > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > index 7145c83c6c8c..21b71148c532 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c > > > > @@ -63,6 +63,11 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = { > > > > VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM > > > > }; > > > > > > > > +#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \ > > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \ > > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) | \ > > > > + (1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO)) > > > > + > > > > > > I think I'd rather we open-coded this, the macro is only > > > used in one place ... > > Yes, in this patch, it is used only in one place. But in next patch > > [1], we use it twice and that make the code look a bit nicer. > > Would we open-coded this in this patch ? > > > > [1] - http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200928033915.82810-2-xiangxia.m.yue at gmail.com/ > > OK then maybe keep this in a series like you did with v1.If this is a fix it has to target net, unlike the other patch.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
- [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
- [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
- [PATCH net v2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO
- [PATCH 1/2] virtio-net: don't disable guest csum when disable LRO