Paul E. McKenney
2007-Nov-30 16:37 UTC
[Bridge] [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
Hello!
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer()
This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit needless memory barriers
for NULL-pointer assignments at compile time with no runtime penalty,
as discussed in the following thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg54852.html
Tested on x86_64 and ppc64, also compiled the four cases (NULL/non-NULL
and const/non-const) with gcc version 4.1.2, and hand-checked the
assembly output.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
rcupdate.h | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24-rc1-ego/include/linux/rcupdate.h
linux-2.6.24-rc1-egoxu/include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- linux-2.6.24-rc1-ego/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2007-11-06 15:30:02.000000000
-0800
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc1-egoxu/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2007-11-30
09:06:11.000000000 -0800
@@ -191,10 +191,13 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_boost(voi
* code.
*/
-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) ({ \
- smp_wmb(); \
- (p) = (v); \
- })
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
+ ({ \
+ if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \
+ ((v) != NULL)) \
+ smp_wmb(); \
+ (p) = (v); \
+ })
/**
* synchronize_sched - block until all CPUs have exited any non-preemptive
Herbert Xu
2007-Nov-30 17:08 UTC
[Bridge] Re: [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:> > The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes > a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This > has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers, > which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer() > This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit needless memory barriers > for NULL-pointer assignments at compile time with no runtime penalty, > as discussed in the following thread: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg54852.html > > Tested on x86_64 and ppc64, also compiled the four cases (NULL/non-NULL > and const/non-const) with gcc version 4.1.2, and hand-checked the > assembly output. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Thanks a lot for following through with this Paul! -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
Paul E. McKenney
2007-Nov-30 22:01 UTC
[Bridge] Re: [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:07:52PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:37:21PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > > The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes > > a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This > > has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers, > > which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer() > > This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit needless memory barriers > > for NULL-pointer assignments at compile time with no runtime penalty, > > as discussed in the following thread: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg54852.html > > > > Tested on x86_64 and ppc64, also compiled the four cases (NULL/non-NULL > > and const/non-const) with gcc version 4.1.2, and hand-checked the > > assembly output. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > Thanks a lot for following through with this Paul!No problem -- after all, it is not every day that one gets the opportunity to make a simple change that speeds things up and makes kernel hackers lives a bit simpler. ;-) Thanx, Paul
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bridge] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/13] wireless: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive
- [PATCH] Add RCU support into Xen - Repost
- [PATCH] Add RCU support into Xen - Repost
- [PATCH v13 1/5] Introduce xbitmap
- [PATCH 0/4] vhost private_data rcu removal