search for: penalti

...that the estimate of overall accuracy for an ordinal gold standard should depend on the absolute values of the penalty matrix. So, I would like to ask, (a) should the penalty matrix always contain at least one penalty with a value of 1 and/or (b) should there be any other constraint on the sum of penalties in the matrix (e.g. should the matrix sum to some multiple of the number of categories), or (c) is one free to use arbitrarily-scaled penalty matrices for estimates of the accuracy of an ordinal gold standard? Thanks, in advance, for your help, Jonathan Williams...

Hello I was wondering of it is possible to have Queue Agents with the same priority (penalty) but with a certain order ? So I have 20 Agents. Agent 1 till Agent 10 has penalty 1. Agent 11 till Agent 15 has penalty 2. (only contacted if 1 -> 10 are busy) Agent 16 till Agent 20 has penalty 3. (only contacted if 1 -> 10 and 11 -> 15 are busy) Within the range of Agent 1 till Agent

Hi, I am using Asterisk 1.4.18. I am implementing Penalties for my agents. What is happening: two agents configuired one agent with penalty 1 and the other with penalty 2. All the calls must go first to Agent 1 and if his line is busy then only then agent 2 will get the call. However my queues are not behaving in this manner. I have impmemnted ringall str...

Dear Users, In case of ridge logistic regression, i want to calculate the optimum penalty using aic and bic criteria. Here is the sample code: fit <- lrm(RES ~CAT01+NUM01+NUM02+CAT02+CAT03+CAT04+NUM03+CAT05+CAT06+NUM04+ CAT07+CAT08+NUM05+NUM06, data = train.data, x = TRUE, y = TRUE) pentrace(fit, penalty = list(seq(.001, 5, by=.1))) output: Best penalty: penalty df 1.001

Hi, I'm strugling to find some documentation on dovecot's anvil service and/or its penalties (that can be checked with doveadm penalty) ... but i'm not finding anything on that. is there any documentation on anvil/penalties that i should check other than a few messages on the mailing list archive ? thanks ! -- Atenciosamente / Sincerily, Leonardo Rodrigues Solutt...

I?ve been using Frank Harrell?s rms package to do bootstrap model validation. Is it the case that the optimum penalization may still give a model which is substantially overfitted? I calculated corrected R^2, optimism in R^2, and corrected slope for various penalties for a simple example: x1 <- rnorm(45) x2 <- rnorm(45) x3 <- rnorm(45) y <- x1 + 2*x2 + rnorm(45,0,3) ols0 <- ols(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, x=TRUE, y=TRUE) corrected.Rsq <- rep(0,60) optimism.Rsq <- rep(0,60) corrected.slope <- rep(0,60) for (pen in 1:60) { olspen <- ols(y ~...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'm using Dovecot v2.2 with unix_listener auth-client { } to verify passwords for a different service. However, it looks like that auth_failure_delay effects all connects going through that socket. I mean: connect /var/run/dovecot2.2/auth-client attempt bad auth 2s penalty NO disconnect ==> Note, it's another connection almost

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 We're running multiple instances on the same server. While doveadm penalty works: root at host:/etc/dovecot# doveadm penalty IP penalty last_penalty last_update 93.180.xxx.xxx 4 2014-05-10 12:21:08 12:21:08 80.153.xxx.xxx 0 2014-05-10 12:21:12 12:21:12 a seperate anvil-Socket doesn't work at all: root

Hi, I can confirm that in the bad behavior, the 5 second delay occurs at each AUTH in our case. I think the configuration we have kill auth process at each end of AUTH (and fork a new one for next next AUTH). I think the "disable" flag is local to the process that is killed / respawned. A collegue of mine, Laurent Guerby, has found a workaround for us and it's findings seems

Hi, I hit a bizare problem with dovecot 2.2.7 on debian 9 with LMTP enabled and auth/penalty disabled as documented here : https://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Penalty Use case : I run a swaks command to send an email to an exim4 that tries to make a callout to dovecot-lmtp. At RCPT TO: swaks hangs 5.0<something-small> seconds then process normally (exim is waiting for callout

On Tue, 6 May 2003, Jerome Asselin wrote: > > I am confused on how the log-likelihood is calculated in a parametric > survival problem with frailty. I see a contradiction in the frailty() help > file vs. the source code of frailty.gamma(), frailty.gaussian() and > frailty.t(). > > The function frailty.gaussian() appears to calculate the penalty as the > negative

Since the changesets: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/9bec70f26637 http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/75b48fa3aec4 there is another problem. A `dovecot stop`, while auth and auth -w are still running, logs: Nov 12 03:17:00 master: Warning: Killed with signal 15 (by pid=31656 uid=0 code=kill) Nov 12 03:17:00 auth: Error: read(anvil-auth-penalty) failed: EOF Nov 12 03:17:00 auth:

Hi All I have been looking at this problem for a few days/weeks now and after some advice please. I currently have a customer on 11.25.3 and I am in the process of upgrading versions and OS (Debian) and all things that involves mysql -> PDO etc The problem I have is the customer want a simple call distribution like this Extn 1001, 1002, 1003 to be called on an incoming call - if they

...Any ideas, suggestions, anyone want to work with me to sort this ? Paddy _____ From: John Kiniston [mailto:johnkiniston at gmail.com] Sent: 28 November 2018 21:17 To: paddy at wizaner.com; Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Queues and penalties This should work, How are you defining your timeouts in the queues.conf ? And to verify, in your extensions.conf you are calling Queue with the queue name and the ruleset to apply from queuerules.conf? On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 12:45 PM Paddy Grice <paddy at wizaner.com> wrote: Hi...

Hi, I'm developing an experiment with logistic regression. I've come across the lrm function in the Design library. While I understand and can use the basic functionality, there are a ton of options that go beyond my knowledge. I've carefully read the help page for lrm, but don't understand many of the arguments and optional return values. (penalty, penalty.matrix,

Hi Timo, on a 32bit Debian squeeze/sid system, with gcc-4.4 (Debian 4.4.2-9) 4.4.3 20100108 (prerelease) I'm getting this warnings: penalty.c: In function ?penalty_timeout?: penalty.c:169: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions test-penalty.c: In function ?test_penalty_checksum?: test-penalty.c:27: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer

Using doveadm penalty I just noticed a penalty for 0.0.0.0. Is this Postfix querying the auth-socket for his SASL-requests? I tried adding 0.0.0.0 to login_trusted_networks, but that doesn't help. Peer -- Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin http://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-42 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Zwangsangaben lt. ?35a GmbHG: HRB 93818 B /

Op 20/12/2018 om 18:09 schreef Ludovic Pouzenc: > Hi, > > I hit a bizare problem with dovecot 2.2.7 on debian 9 with LMTP enabled and auth/penalty disabled as documented here : > https://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication/Penalty > > Use case : I run a swaks command to send an email to an exim4 that tries to make a callout to dovecot-lmtp. > At RCPT TO: swaks hangs

Can anyone shed any light on an issue with agent penalties? I have 2 queues set up with agents working both queues, but where agent 1 should have a penalty for queue 2 and agent 2 should have a penalty for queue 1. When a call is sent to either queue, it rings agents with and without penalties at the same time. I set up a second system and cannot re...

Anyone have experience specifying the "penalty.factor" option in the "glmnet" command? I have 3 variables (out of a million genotype variables) that I want to force into the model (i.e., set penalty factor to 0), but I can't figure out how to do that. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]