search for: rcu_assign_pointer

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 278 matches for "rcu_assign_pointer".

2007 Nov 30
2
[Bridge] [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
Hello! The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers, which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer() This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit nee...
2013 Sep 25
1
[Bridge] [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/13] wireless: Apply rcu_access_pointer() to avoid sparse false positive
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> The sparse checking for rcu_assign_pointer() was recently upgraded to reject non-__kernel address spaces. This also rejects __rcu, which is almost always the right thing to do. However, the uses in cfg80211_combine_bsses() and cfg80211_bss_update() are legitimate: They is assigning a pointer to an element from an RCU-protected list, and a...
2013 May 07
5
[PATCH 0/4] vhost private_data rcu removal
Asias He (4): vhost-net: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost-test: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost-scsi: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost: Remove custom vhost rcu usage drivers/vhost/net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 17 ++++++----------- drivers/vhost/test.c | 20
2013 May 07
5
[PATCH 0/4] vhost private_data rcu removal
Asias He (4): vhost-net: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost-test: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost-scsi: Always access vq->private_data under vq mutex vhost: Remove custom vhost rcu usage drivers/vhost/net.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/vhost/scsi.c | 17 ++++++----------- drivers/vhost/test.c | 20
2007 Nov 27
1
[PATCH][BRIDGE] Properly dereference the br_should_route_hook
This hook is protected with the RCU, so simple if (br_should_route_hook) br_should_route_hook(...) is not enough on some architectures. Use the rcu_dereference/rcu_assign_pointer in this case. Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> --- diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index 3cedd4e..b42b192 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c @@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static inline int is_link_local(const unsigned char *dest...
2019 Jul 23
2
[PATCH 5/6] vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit
...uninit_vq_maps(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > for (i = 0; i < VHOST_NUM_ADDRS; i++) { > map[i] = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->maps[i], > lockdep_is_held(&vq->mmu_lock)); > - if (map[i]) > + if (map[i]) { > + vhost_set_map_dirty(vq, map[i], i); > rcu_assign_pointer(vq->maps[i], NULL); > + } > } > spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock); > > @@ -354,7 +368,6 @@ static void vhost_invalidate_vq_start(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, > { > struct vhost_uaddr *uaddr = &vq->uaddrs[index]; > struct vhost_map *map; > - int i; &gt...
2019 Jul 23
2
[PATCH 5/6] vhost: mark dirty pages during map uninit
...uninit_vq_maps(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq) > for (i = 0; i < VHOST_NUM_ADDRS; i++) { > map[i] = rcu_dereference_protected(vq->maps[i], > lockdep_is_held(&vq->mmu_lock)); > - if (map[i]) > + if (map[i]) { > + vhost_set_map_dirty(vq, map[i], i); > rcu_assign_pointer(vq->maps[i], NULL); > + } > } > spin_unlock(&vq->mmu_lock); > > @@ -354,7 +368,6 @@ static void vhost_invalidate_vq_start(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, > { > struct vhost_uaddr *uaddr = &vq->uaddrs[index]; > struct vhost_map *map; > - int i; &gt...
2017 Nov 03
1
[PATCH v17 1/6] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap
...t, index, 0, &node, &slot); > + if (err) > + return err; > + bitmap = rcu_dereference_raw(*slot); > + if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) { > + unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap; > + > + if (ebit < BITS_PER_LONG) { > + tmp |= 1UL << ebit; > + rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp); > + return 0; > + } > + bitmap = this_cpu_xchg(ida_bitmap, NULL); > + if (!bitmap) Please write locking rules, in order to explain how memory allocated by __radix_tree_create() will not leak. > + return -EAGAIN; > + memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof(*bitmap))...
2017 Nov 03
1
[PATCH v17 1/6] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap
...t, index, 0, &node, &slot); > + if (err) > + return err; > + bitmap = rcu_dereference_raw(*slot); > + if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) { > + unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap; > + > + if (ebit < BITS_PER_LONG) { > + tmp |= 1UL << ebit; > + rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp); > + return 0; > + } > + bitmap = this_cpu_xchg(ida_bitmap, NULL); > + if (!bitmap) Please write locking rules, in order to explain how memory allocated by __radix_tree_create() will not leak. > + return -EAGAIN; > + memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof(*bitmap))...
2014 Dec 09
4
[LLVMdev] dmb ishld in AArch64
..., it’s stated that memory access around DMB should not be reordered, but when compiling the Linux kernel, I found load/store in static inline void hlist_add_before_rcu(struct hlist_node *n, struct hlist_node *next) { n->pprev = next->pprev; n->next = next; rcu_assign_pointer(hlist_pprev_rcu(n), n); next->pprev = &n->next; } can reordered, and causes kernel crash. f94006a8 ldr x8, [x21,#8] f9000275 str x21, [x19] d5033abf dmb ishst f9400669 ldr x9, [x19,#8] f9000668 str x8, [x19,#8] <==== reordered str f9000133 str x19, [x9] f90006b3 str x19, [...
2017 Aug 03
0
[PATCH v13 1/5] Introduce xbitmap
...2 - 1) + +/* * Per-cpu pool of preloaded nodes */ struct radix_tree_preload { @@ -840,6 +849,8 @@ int __radix_tree_create(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long index, offset, 0, 0); if (!child) return -ENOMEM; + if (is_idr(root)) + all_tag_set(child, IDR_FREE); rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, node_to_entry(child)); if (node) node->count++; @@ -1986,8 +1997,8 @@ void __radix_tree_delete_node(struct radix_tree_root *root, delete_node(root, node, update_node, private); } -static bool __radix_tree_delete(struct radix_tree_root *root, - struct radix_tree_node *node...
2010 Jul 15
2
[PATCH] vhost-net: avoid flush under lock
...5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c index 28d7786..50df58e6 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c @@ -534,11 +534,16 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock); vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq); done: + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); + if (oldsock) { vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index); fput(oldsock->file); } + mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex); + return 0; + err_vq: mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); err: -- 1.7.2.rc...
2010 Jul 15
2
[PATCH] vhost-net: avoid flush under lock
...5 +++++ 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c index 28d7786..50df58e6 100644 --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c @@ -534,11 +534,16 @@ static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, int fd) rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock); vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq); done: + mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); + if (oldsock) { vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index); fput(oldsock->file); } + mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex); + return 0; + err_vq: mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex); err: -- 1.7.2.rc...
2019 Jul 03
3
[PATCH v2 1/3] vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock
...mutex_init(&vsock->rx_lock); > mutex_init(&vsock->event_lock); > @@ -613,6 +627,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > virtio_vsock_event_fill(vsock); > mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock); > > + vdev->priv = vsock; > + rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock); You probably need to use rcu_dereference_protected() to access the_virtio_vsock in the function in order to survive from sparse. > + > mutex_unlock(&the_virtio_vsock_mutex); > return 0; > > @@ -627,6 +644,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remo...
2019 Jul 03
3
[PATCH v2 1/3] vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock
...mutex_init(&vsock->rx_lock); > mutex_init(&vsock->event_lock); > @@ -613,6 +627,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) > virtio_vsock_event_fill(vsock); > mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock); > > + vdev->priv = vsock; > + rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock); You probably need to use rcu_dereference_protected() to access the_virtio_vsock in the function in order to survive from sparse. > + > mutex_unlock(&the_virtio_vsock_mutex); > return 0; > > @@ -627,6 +644,12 @@ static void virtio_vsock_remo...
2017 Nov 03
0
[PATCH v17 1/6] lib/xbitmap: Introduce xbitmap
...2 - 1) + +/* * Per-cpu pool of preloaded nodes */ struct radix_tree_preload { @@ -840,6 +853,8 @@ int __radix_tree_create(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned long index, offset, 0, 0); if (!child) return -ENOMEM; + if (is_idr(root)) + all_tag_set(child, IDR_FREE); rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, node_to_entry(child)); if (node) node->count++; @@ -1986,8 +2001,8 @@ void __radix_tree_delete_node(struct radix_tree_root *root, delete_node(root, node, update_node, private); } -static bool __radix_tree_delete(struct radix_tree_root *root, - struct radix_tree_node *node...
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH v2 1/3] vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock
...;> mutex_init(&vsock->event_lock); >>> @@ -613,6 +627,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>> virtio_vsock_event_fill(vsock); >>> mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock); >>> + vdev->priv = vsock; >>> + rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock); >> >> You probably need to use rcu_dereference_protected() to access >> the_virtio_vsock in the function in order to survive from sparse. >> > Ooo, thanks! > > Do you mean when we check if the_virtio_vsock is not null at the beginning of &g...
2019 Jul 04
2
[PATCH v2 1/3] vsock/virtio: use RCU to avoid use-after-free on the_virtio_vsock
...;> mutex_init(&vsock->event_lock); >>> @@ -613,6 +627,9 @@ static int virtio_vsock_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev) >>> virtio_vsock_event_fill(vsock); >>> mutex_unlock(&vsock->event_lock); >>> + vdev->priv = vsock; >>> + rcu_assign_pointer(the_virtio_vsock, vsock); >> >> You probably need to use rcu_dereference_protected() to access >> the_virtio_vsock in the function in order to survive from sparse. >> > Ooo, thanks! > > Do you mean when we check if the_virtio_vsock is not null at the beginning of &g...
2019 Jul 31
14
[PATCH V2 0/9] Fixes for metadata accelreation
Hi all: This series try to fix several issues introduced by meta data accelreation series. Please review. Changes from V1: - Try not use RCU to syncrhonize MMU notifier with vhost worker - set dirty pages after no readers - return -EAGAIN only when we find the range is overlapped with metadata Jason Wang (9): vhost: don't set uaddr for invalid address vhost: validate MMU notifier
2017 Nov 03
0
[PATCH v17 2/6] radix tree test suite: add tests for xbitmap
...= bit + 2; + + err = __radix_tree_create(root, index, 0, &node, &slot); + if (err) + return err; + bitmap = rcu_dereference_raw(*slot); + if (radix_tree_exception(bitmap)) { + unsigned long tmp = (unsigned long)bitmap; + + if (ebit < BITS_PER_LONG) { + tmp |= 1UL << ebit; + rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, (void *)tmp); + return 0; + } + bitmap = this_cpu_xchg(ida_bitmap, NULL); + if (!bitmap) + return -EAGAIN; + memset(bitmap, 0, sizeof(*bitmap)); + bitmap->bitmap[0] = tmp >> RADIX_TREE_EXCEPTIONAL_SHIFT; + rcu_assign_pointer(*slot, bitmap); + } + + if (!bitmap) { + if (eb...