Hi!
Jens Seidel reported a bug to Debian about a wrong message on brctl, you can
see it at http://bugs.debian.org/383938, it is kind of the continuation of
the ENODEV bug #348617 that was already patched by Stephen on the git.
I have applied the same solution that Stephen applied for the first one,
follows the patch against git plus a minor exclamation mark modification I
did so that all ENODEV messages were exclamative (Stephen patch had missed
that mark).
Regards...
--
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
diff -u -r bridge-utils.old/brctl/brctl_cmd.c bridge-utils-1.1/brctl/brctl_cmd.c
--- bridge-utils.old/brctl/brctl_cmd.c 2006-08-26 19:31:23.000000000 +0200
+++ bridge-utils-1.1/brctl/brctl_cmd.c 2006-08-26 19:31:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
if (if_nametoindex(ifname) == 0)
fprintf(stderr, "interface %s does not exist!\n", ifname);
else
- fprintf(stderr, "bridge %s does not exist\n", brname);
+ fprintf(stderr, "bridge %s does not exist!\n", brname);
break;
case EBUSY:
@@ -139,8 +139,10 @@
continue;
case ENODEV:
- fprintf(stderr, "interface %s does not exist!\n",
- ifname);
+ if (if_nametoindex(ifname) == 0)
+ fprintf(stderr, "interface %s does not exist!\n", ifname);
+ else
+ fprintf(stderr, "bridge %s does not exist!\n", brname);
break;
case EINVAL: