Kashyap Chamarthy
2018-Feb-09 10:48 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: > > We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a > > central palce! > > Please review the three edits I've submitted to the wiki: > https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Special:Contributions/Fghaas > > Feel free to ruthlessly edit/roll back anything that is inaccurate. > Thanks!I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.) You wrote: "L2...which does no further virtualization". Not quite true — "under right circumstances" (read: sufficiently huge machine with tons of RAM), L2 _can_ in turn L3. :-) Last time I checked (this morning), Rich W.M. Jones had 4 levels of nesting tested with the 'supernested' program[1] he wrote. (Related aside: This program is packaged it as part of 2016 QEMU Advent Calendar[2] -- if you want to play around on a powerful test machine with tons of free memory.) [1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=supernested.git;a=blob;f=README [2] http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2016/#day-13 -- /kashyap
Florian Haas
2018-Feb-09 11:02 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 06:44:43PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:07 PM, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote: >> > We should certainly document what I have summaries here properly at a >> > central palce! >> >> Please review the three edits I've submitted to the wiki: >> https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Special:Contributions/Fghaas >> >> Feel free to ruthlessly edit/roll back anything that is inaccurate. >> Thanks! > > I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the > Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.)I'm sure they it does, but just so you know I currently don't see any edits from you on the Nested Guests page. Are you sure you saved/published your changes?> You wrote: "L2...which does no further virtualization". Not quite true > — "under right circumstances" (read: sufficiently huge machine with tons > of RAM), L2 _can_ in turn L3. :-)Insert "normally" between "which" and "does", then. :)> Last time I checked (this morning), Rich W.M. Jones had 4 levels of > nesting tested with the 'supernested' program[1] he wrote. (Related > aside: This program is packaged it as part of 2016 QEMU Advent > Calendar[2] -- if you want to play around on a powerful test machine > with tons of free memory.) > > [1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=supernested.git;a=blob;f=README > [2] http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2016/#day-13Interesting, thanks for the pointer! Cheers, Florian
Kashyap Chamarthy
2018-Feb-12 09:27 UTC
Re: [libvirt-users] Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 12:02:25PM +0100, Florian Haas wrote:> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:48 AM, Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com> wrote:[...]> > I've made some minor edits to clarify a bunch of bits, and a link to the > > Kernel doc about Intel nVMX. (Hope that looks fine.) > > I'm sure they it does, but just so you know I currently don't see any > edits from you on the Nested Guests page. Are you sure you > saved/published your changes?Thanks for catching that. _Now_ it's updated. https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Nested_Guests (I also didn't have permissions to add external links; had to get that sorted out with the admin.)> > You wrote: "L2...which does no further virtualization". Not quite true > > — "under right circumstances" (read: sufficiently huge machine with tons > > of RAM), L2 _can_ in turn L3. :-) > > Insert "normally" between "which" and "does", then. :):-)> > Last time I checked (this morning), Rich W.M. Jones had 4 levels of > > nesting tested with the 'supernested' program[1] he wrote. (Related > > aside: This program is packaged it as part of 2016 QEMU Advent > > Calendar[2] -- if you want to play around on a powerful test machine > > with tons of free memory.) > > > > [1] http://git.annexia.org/?p=supernested.git;a=blob;f=README > > [2] http://www.qemu-advent-calendar.org/2016/#day-13 > > Interesting, thanks for the pointer! > > Cheers, > Florian-- /kashyap
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Re: Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
- Re: Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
- Re: Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
- Re: Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)
- Re: Nested KVM: L0 guest produces kernel BUG on wakeup from managed save (while a nested VM is running)