Olaf Hering
2012-Sep-03 09:06 UTC
[Libguestfs] fallback to virtio_blk if guest kernel lacks virtio_scsi support
Currently virtio_scsi is forced if qemu in the host supports this feature. This test does however not take the capabilities of the started guest into account. As a result no disks will be found if the guest kernel is older than 3.4. I forced qemu_supports_virtio_scsi to return always 0, which seem to work well for the kernel versions as shipped in SLES11SP2, openSuSE 12.1 and older. Is there any functionality that would be missing if a guest kernel has just virtio_blk? How can I force the host tools to not enable virtio_scsi? Should it be a runtime option, or should it be done at build time with --disable-virtio_scsi or something like that? Olaf
Richard W.M. Jones
2012-Sep-03 10:01 UTC
[Libguestfs] fallback to virtio_blk if guest kernel lacks virtio_scsi support
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:06:01AM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:> > Currently virtio_scsi is forced if qemu in the host supports this > feature. This test does however not take the capabilities of the started > guest into account. As a result no disks will be found if the guest > kernel is older than 3.4.There's not a good way for us to detect this, that I know of. For example you can't easily query if a random kernel supports a feature (eg: virtio-scsi might have been compiled directly into the kernel). In Fedora we tend to have the latest of everything, so this is not an issue. In the long term, virtio-scsi is so much better than virtio-blk that (eventually) I think we will demand that everyone use it.> I forced qemu_supports_virtio_scsi to return always 0, which seem to > work well for the kernel versions as shipped in SLES11SP2, openSuSE 12.1 > and older. Is there any functionality that would be missing if a guest > kernel has just virtio_blk?Now: using up to 255 disks. In future: hotplugging, proper handling of sparseness.> How can I force the host tools to not enable virtio_scsi? Should it be a > runtime option, or should it be done at build time with > --disable-virtio_scsi or something like that?I don't know if I want to add extra complexity for this, given what I said above about virtio-scsi being clearly a better option for the future. Can you maintain a small out-of-tree patch for this until OpenSuSE updates its kernel? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Notes on compiling libguestfs 1.19.59 on Debian 7 (Wheezy) beta
- [V2V PATCH v3 1/6] Revert "Remove guestcaps_block_type Virtio_SCSI"
- [V2V PATCH v2 1/5] Revert "Remove guestcaps_block_type Virtio_SCSI"
- [V2V PATCH v2 1/5] Revert "Remove guestcaps_block_type Virtio_SCSI"
- [V2V PATCH v2 1/5] Revert "Remove guestcaps_block_type Virtio_SCSI"