search for: 1024kbps

Hello everybody on the list, I have the following situation where I want to police the speed of incoming packets from specific subnets to 1024kbps and then police all the rest to 256kbps, which is the speed my ISP grants for the rest of the internet. So, eth1 is the one connected to the cable modem and then to the internet. I do: tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress handle ffff: then: tc filter add dev eth1 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 u32...

Dear all, I have 3 backbones for my local network. 1st backbone: down 1024kbps, up 1024kbps through eth1 2nd backbone: down 2048kbps, up 2048kbps through eth2 3rd backbone: down 1024kbps, up 128kbps through eth3 Local network: 192.168.0.0/16 through eth0 Router: Linux Slakware 11 with iproute2 Please let me know how to shape both incoming and outgoing traffic for this case....

Dear folks, Here goes my bandwidth manager: INTERNET | |eth0 202.14.41.1 BW.Manager | | | +----eth1----192.168.1.0/24 | +------eth2----192.168.2.0/24 Total incoming bandwidth to eth0 is 1024kbps should be shared to eth1 and eth2, which mean each get 512Kbps and burstable to 1024Kbps if other host is idle. My question is how do i apply HTB to these situation ? As far as i know eth1 and eth2 should be define as parent and cannot be as children. Regards, Rio Martin. ---------------------...

...d 2:1 \ htb rate $MAX_PUBLIC_RATE burst 20k tc class add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE parent 2: classid 2:200 \ htb rate 16kbit tc qdisc add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE parent 2:200 sfq perturb 10 # 213.215.42.71 tc class add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE parent 2:1 classid 2:71 \ htb rate 1024kbps ceil 1024kbps burst 20k tc qdisc add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE parent 2:71 handle 71: sfq perturb 10 tc filter add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE protocol ip parent 2:71 \ prio 1 handle 71 fw flowid 2:71 # 213.215.42.72 tc class add dev $PUBLIC_INTERFACE parent 2:1 classid 2:72 \ htb...

...Format 192.246.69.223 613 1770bf3430d 00102/00000 00000ms 0000ms 4 150.187.xxx.yyy ildefonso C72ACD25-1A 00101/11482 00000ms 0000ms 2 2 active SIP channel(s) My guess: Format 4=G711u, Format 2=gsm. My question: Is there any way to force SIP to use a codec. See, we have a 1024kbps connection for data and voice, and I don't like the idea of "eating" 64kbps of the channel for each call. Addionaly, when there are other people (here we have around 1500 computers, all of them trying to get throug the 1024kbps link) using the data link, it gets almost imposible...

...t so ?! anyway here is my script for anyone who can help ...thanks one thing is when i ftp 2 files ... the speed is higher than the ceiling limit .... kernel is 2.4.22 ... with QoS enabled .... tc qdisc add dev wlan0 root handle 1:0 htb tc class add dev wlan0 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 1024kbps ceil 1024kbps tc class add dev wlan0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 1kbps ceil 64kbps tc class add dev wlan0 parent 1:1 classid 1:20 htb rate 1kbps ceil 128kbps tc class add dev wlan0 parent 1:1 classid 1:30 htb rate 1kbps ceil 256kbps tc class add dev wlan0 parent 1:1 classid 1:40 htb rate 1...

...mpile this file with tcc filename > limit.sh and run that file */ dev eth1 { egress { class ( <$myhost> ) if ip_dst == 172.31.0.2; class ( <$others> ) if 1 ; htb () { class ( rate 2048kbps, ceil 2048kbps ) { $myhost = class ( rate 1024kbps, ceil 1024kbps ) ; $others = class ( rate 10bps, ceil 500kbps ) ; } } } } Groeten, Joost Kraaijeveld Askesis B.V. Molukkenstraat 14 6524NB Nijmegen tel: 024-3888063 / 06-51855277 fax: 024-3608416 e-mail: J.Kraaijeveld@Askesis.nl web: www.askesis.nl ______...

Here is the setup: POTS -> PRI -> Asterisk -> ATA (Fax) The ATA is set to only 711. Asterisk's sip.conf sets this device to only 711. Yet, faxing works less than 50% of the time. I cannot possibly be the only person with this problem. I can't even get app_rxfax to work. It answers but rxfax drops the call 5 seconds into it. If anyone out there has near 100% success with

...eth0 { > egress { > class ( <$ip0> ) if ip_src == IP0 ; > class ( <$ip1> ) if ip_src == IP1 ; > htb () { > class ( rate 1544kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) { /* T1 speed */ > $ip0 = class ( rate 1024kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) ; > $ip1 = class ( rate 384kbps, ceil 1544kbps ) ; > } > } > } > } > > Alternately, you may wish to simulate virtual circuits with each of > the IP addresses on a machine. In this case, you could...

Hi. I understand that device aliases (e.g. eth2:3) are not shapeable. Does anybody know if this functionality is planned in the future? Anyway, for the time being the only option that seems to leave is to fwmark packets differently for each device alias and then shape based on that. Is it possible to set multiple marks on the packets? Alternatively, is it possible to check for a specific

...ith CentOS) 3. Hardware to be used would be Intel Core 2 Duo on an Asus P5B-VM-D0 (Q965, ICH8-D0, Intel GMA3000 GPU) with SATA hard disks. 4. Network bandwidth control based on request IP or domains (i.e. connections to IP #1 can be limited to 512Kbps, while connections to IP #2 can be limited to 1024Kbps, or connections to www.domainA.com is limited to 256Kbps etc. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070331/0e42a9a5/attachment.html>

...in the few weeks lately. Here is my setup: INTERNET <----------> [eth0] SHAPER-BOX [eth1] <----------> USER-FARM both eth0 & eth1 got public ips (202.x.x.x) Why traffic monitored at eth0 is bigger than eth1 ? eth1 shaped just exactly the same as rate i defined in HTB. I just have 1024Kbps from my ISP and i defined the total parent rate for 768Kbps. But what happened is the traffic monitored at eth0 almost all the time eating all the bandwidth we have. # DOWNSTREAM 768Kbps /sbin/ip link set imq1 up /sbin/tc qdisc add dev imq1 root handle 2: htb default 0 /sbin/tc class add dev imq...

...for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given client the *sum* of incoming and outgoing traffic is somehow defined? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is your line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar with HTB, my download shaping works fine. However, I would like shape both incoming+outgoing traffic in a way that the sum of actual outgoing and incoming rates of all my clients would be always below the ISP''s line speed in order to...

Hi all, I'm using VOIPJET to make international calls with an IAX2 connection between my local asterisk server and their server(s). At times I seem to have a problem if 5 or more international calls are made at once - I'm on a 1024kbps download and 256kbps upload DSL line (only the asterisk server uses this DSL line). Today I switched the codec from ulaw to ilbc in an attempt to lower the bandwidth requirements. I have read many times that IAX2 has a signaling overhead (30 or 40kbps?) and then every channel uses the codec bandw...

...g solution for the shaping both incoming and outgoing traffic in such way, that for a given class the sum of incoming and outgoing traffic is specified? My ISP does the same thing, it gives me just a line of a defined rate, no matter the traffic direction (i.e. here is the line, the clock speed is 1024kbps, do what you want). I''m a litte bit familiar with HTB on Linux, my download shaping works fine. However, I would like to shape both incoming+outgoing traffic in a way that the sum of actual outgoing and incoming rates of all classes would be always below the ISP''s line speed in...

Hi all, I have setup two multipath route tables on my system for doing failover routing, What I want it''s that if GW at route1 of the MP is dead, traffic goes by route2, for doing that I have created the multipath routes as follows: ip route add table mail.traffic proto static nexthop via ${GW1} dev eth1 weight 1 nexthop via ${GW2} dev eth1 weight 250 But it does not run as I

...lients (>900), and the amount of connections (>8000 at any time, with peacks of up to 90.000 (yes, that much)) the cisco router was colapsing, we added the linux router and now everything works A LOT better. We have two ISPs, hence two connections, one of 384kbps/128kbps and the other of 1024kbps/1024kbps. Additionally, it is not as durable as you may expect, I saw a cisco Catalist 2900 swtich die due to a power peak, and when I looked at the power source, there was a filter design problem (this equipment would not survive more than one year without a regulator/peak suppresor AND exte...

.......|.......| ........|.......|-> 3 ........|...........|->HFSC P2P(Min 0 Kb, Max 1024 Kb, all shared) ........| ........|-> HFSC (User2) (etc) ..etc... What I''m aiming for is: No matter what type of traffic is being transferred, the user is guaranteed 512Kbps and can max out at 1024Kbps, but can also burst up to 1536Kbps for 2 seconds. VoIP / SSH / Telnet / non-data ACK packets get priority over everything else. It would be guaranteed 128Kbps of bandwidth if it were needed. Ideally, it would not reserve that bandwidth unless it was actually needed. It should also get more bandwi...

Guys I''m looking for some advice on the following situation: We''re serving a residential complex with internet, the network has grown and with it has the problems, below is a descriptive layout of our current setup: Connection: ADSL Down/Up speed: 512kbps/256kbps (1024kbps/256kbps in the near future) 2.0GHz Celeron D with 512MB RAM Current users: 140 Maximum amount of users: 509 We''re currently serving them with an HTB-based solution, but now it''s surfacing that some user on the network don''t get shaped correctly. They''re current...

...ys active, I have VoIP, and, off course, p2p. I also have to route traffic for local net through the same router :-S I created a default class (30), any traffic that I didn''t wanted to give priority went here. And I created others (let me look at the scripts :P ): My max bandwith is 1024kbps. 10: Standart burst traffic (http,ftp,tftp,pop,imap,https). rate 250kbit ceil 97% of total uplink(downlink) prio 3. 14: Higher prio traffic (VoIP): rate 170kbit ceil 97% of total. prio 1. 15: ACK and these kind (SSH, and other interactive traffic, telnet). rate 170kbit ceil 97% prio 2. 20: Serv...