Chris Bolton
2004-Jul-06 07:22 UTC
FW: Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
>> No I am using the EN5861, just that we have two ADSL lines and only >> one >> EN5861 and rather than buying another I''d like to use linux to do the >> same job as the en5861, if you know what I mean. > >You can, but since you have two ADSL lines, you''ll need two ADSL devices ofsome kind, whether it''s a pair of 5861s, or a 5861 and an ADSL port adapter (external modem, PCI card, whatever) that Linux supports.> >The simplest solution will be to have the same setup for both lines.Either use two 5861s, or get two ADSL adapters that Linux >can talk to.> >> So far I''ve set up ppp0:0 which I''ve assigned one of the static ip >> addresses supplied to us by our ISP but when I try and route through >> it i.e. ip route add default dev ppp0:0 table T1 then it returns the >> error no such device, which it''s quite right there isn''t. If I route >> through it using the ip address of ppp0:0 i.e ip route add default via >> x.x.x.193 table T1 then it does work but anything that goes through it >> ends up using the IP address of ppp0. > >So both lines were supplied by the same ISP?They sure are. Due to our location we can''t have an ADSL line faster than 512kbs so we''ve got two and I''m trying to load balance them.. But that''s another story.> >> So how can I set up the linux box to use these static IP addresses in >> the same way I can with the EN5861? > >If you want to remove the 5861 from the picture entirely, you''ll need toreplace it with some sort of ADSL adapter. You can''t just plug a DSL line into an ethernet card.>> I hope I''d made myself clear, it''s hard trying to explain something >> when your not to sure exactly what your talking about. Anyway any >> help with be gladly received. > >It would help if you could draw a diagram of your network so we could get abetter idea of what yo''re trying to do. Ok I''m not the best at ASCII diagrams but here goes anyway... (well I''ll modify the one in the advanced routing howto) +------------+ / +---------------| | | IP ADDRESSES | +----------+ EN5861 +------- EN5861 - 217.x.196.222 __ | | | | / eth0 - 10.0.0.152 ___/ \_ +------+-------+ +------------+ | eth1 - 217.x.196.217 _/ \__ | eth2 eth1 | / eth2 - 217.x.196.218 / \eth0 | | | ppp0 - 217.x.230.198 | Local network -----+ Linux router | | ppp0:0 - 217.x.230.193 \_ __/ | | | Internet \__ __/ | ppp0 | \ \___/ +------+-------+ +------------+ | | | | \ +-------------+ USB +------- | Speedtouch | | +------------+ As you can see the linux router has 3 network adapters, eth0 being the local lan and eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I''ve done that because I couldn''t work out any other way to use the static IP address that out ISP have given us. For each connection we''ve got 5 IP addresses plus one for for the router. Eth1 & eth2 work fine ie both have the correct static IP address given to us by our ISP but it seems impraticle putting in another 3 cards to make use of the other IP addresses we have, there must be another way. Cheers for the replies, I hope this makes things a bit easier to understand. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Ed Wildgoose
2004-Jul-06 10:33 UTC
Re: FW: Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
>eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I''ve done that >because I couldn''t work out any other way to use the static IP address that >out ISP have given us. >Aha, this is a config question. You can just add as many ip addresses to each physical card as you like. I forget the exact syntax, but check man pages for "ifconfig" and look for "aliases". Chances are your distro already has support for this. For example in gentoo you edit /etc/conf.d/net and edit the aliases line. Different configs for all "normal" distros, but same idea _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
James Sneeringer
2004-Jul-06 15:52 UTC
Re: FW: Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
[Sorry if this is received twice. Sent it with the wrong address once, not sure if the moderator will approve it.] On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 08:22:42AM +0100, Chris Bolton wrote:> Ok I''m not the best at ASCII diagrams but here goes anyway... (well I''ll > modify the one in the advanced routing howto)Does this look right? Forget eth0 on Linux for a moment. ---------- ---------- | | eth1 217.x.196.217/29 --- 217.x.196.222/29 | EN5861 | ___ DSL ___ | | eth2 217.x.196.218/29 --------------- eth0 | router | #1 | Linux | ---------- | router | -------------- | | ppp0 217.x.230.198/29 ---------------- | Speedtouch | ___ DSL ___ | | ppp0:0 217.x.230.193/29 -----'' | DSL bridge | #2 ---------- --------------> As you can see the linux router has 3 network adapters, eth0 being the local > lan and eth1 & eth2 are both connected to the EN5861 router. I''ve done that > because I couldn''t work out any other way to use the static IP address that > out ISP have given us. For each connection we''ve got 5 IP addresses plus > one for for the router. Eth1 & eth2 work fine ie both have the correct > static IP address given to us by our ISP but it seems impraticle putting in > another 3 cards to make use of the other IP addresses we have, there must be > another way.Ok, so the Speedtouch is some sort of DSL bridge, right? Meaning when you establish PPP (PPPoE?) to your ISP, you really have another ethernet card (eth3?) connected to the Speedtouch? First, as someone else pointed out, the eth1/eth2 connections to the EN5861 are redundant. You can set up interface aliases on eth1 so it has both IP addresses. % ip addr add 217.x.196.217/29 brd 217.x.196.223 dev eth1 % ip addr add 217.x.196.218/29 brd 217.x.196.223 dev eth1 label eth1:0 PPP is set up similarly. (PPPoE might configure ppp0 for you.) % ip addr add 217.x.230.198/29 brd 217.x.230.199 dev ppp0 % ip addr add 217.x.230.193/29 brd 217.x.230.199 dev ppp0 label ppp0:0 You can continue to add as many aliases to either interface as you like. Your problem then becomes load-balancing outbound traffic, because you have two potential default routes. One is the PPPoE connection via the Speedtouch (the remote IP is probably the DSL concentrator at your ISP). The other is the EN5861 on 217.x.196.222/29 (which in turn is probably talking to the same DSL concentrator as the Speedtouch). The simplest approach (aside from defaulting everything out one interface, which you probably don''t want) is to policy route based on source IP. If the source IP of a packet as it leaves the Linux router is 217.x.196.x/29, the packet should get routed via eth1 to the EN5861. If the source is 217.x.230.x/29, it should be routed via ppp0 to the Speedpath. There are examples of this in the LARTC HOWTO. How you want to set up your NAT for eth0 to take advantage of one connection or the other is up to you. -James _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Possibly Parallel Threads
- FW: FW: Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
- Static ip addresses/aliases previously (my mistake) htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
- htb: class 10007 isn''t work conserving ?!
- htb: class isn''t work conserving ?!
- MTU and Voice Delay (latency??)