I''m not a programmer per se (including C), but... I''d like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20), SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the current maximum. I''m a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-) Instead I''d like to hear if anyone has done something similar? -- Mvh. / Best regards, Steen Suder <http://www.suder.dk/> ICQ UIN 4133803 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
Steen Suder, privat wrote:> I''m not a programmer per se (including C), but... > > I''d like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20), > SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It > could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the > current maximum. > > I''m a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-) > Instead I''d like to hear if anyone has done something similar? >AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things like Depth and other parameter. search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?) Greetings Tobias _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Monday 06 January 2003 17:52, Tobias Geiger wrote:> Steen Suder, privat wrote: > > I''m not a programmer per se (including C), but... > > > > I''d like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20), > > SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It > > could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the > > current maximum. > > > > I''m a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-) > > Instead I''d like to hear if anyone has done something similar? > > AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things > like Depth and other parameter. > search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i > compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?)I have it on the faq page on www.docum.org. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
http://www.ssi.bg/~alex/esfq/index.html -- Nikolay Datchev On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Stef Coene wrote:> On Monday 06 January 2003 17:52, Tobias Geiger wrote: > > Steen Suder, privat wrote: > > > I''m not a programmer per se (including C), but... > > > > > > I''d like to be able to give the define in sch_sfq.c (of, say, 2.4.20), > > > SFS_DEPTH other values than 128 as an argument on the tc commandline. It > > > could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the > > > current maximum. > > > > > > I''m a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-) > > > Instead I''d like to hear if anyone has done something similar? > > > > AFAIK a qdisc named "esfq" allready exists where you can setup things > > like Depth and other parameter. > > search the mailling-list archive on lartc.org for the URL (last time i > > compilied it was for 2.4.18; i hope they made the code 2.4.20 ready ?) > I have it on the faq page on www.docum.org. > > Stef > > -- > > stef.coene@docum.org > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > #lartc @ irc.oftc.net > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >_______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/