search for: suder

...lved? A snippet from the /etc/sysctl.conf: net.ipv4.route.max_size=32768 net.ipv4.route.gc_min_interval=5 net.ipv4.route.gc_interval=300 It''s a 2.4.23-box and it does SNAT on all four DSLs. It''s pretty open from the inside towards the Internet. -- Mvh. / Best regards, Steen Suder <http://www.suder.dk/> ICQ UIN 4133803 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...n the tc commandline. It could be powers of two up to 2^7 (128) as it seems that 128 is the current maximum. I''m a little anxious to ask the question "How do I do that?" ;-) Instead I''d like to hear if anyone has done something similar? -- Mvh. / Best regards, Steen Suder <http://www.suder.dk/> ICQ UIN 4133803 _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

.... I know that this issue has been brought up on several occasions, but I have found no solutions to this "simple" issue. Does anyone have suggestions on how to handle this, besides "nailing" the traffic to a specific uplink, based on DST PORT? -- Mvh. / Best regards, Steen Suder _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I have one Q. What is better when using as leaf in one leaf with several hosts (like subnet) to splice traffic equaly to user number? Like 2 users = 256/2, 3 = 256/3 and so on. WRR was pretty good for this job, but it''s only for 2.4.21 kernels and mine''s 2.4.22. So what is better: SFQ or TBF? -- Artūras Šlajus _______________________________________________