Can I use the same SFQ queue dicipline for all the classe in a CBQ or HBT system?
On Friday 26 April 2002 01:10, Stasi wrote:> Can I use the same SFQ queue dicipline for all the classe in a CBQ or > HBT system?No. If you add a SFQ, you can specify a handle. But you can''t add the same SFQ (with the same handle) to a second class. So each class gets his own SFQ. Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
And it doesn''t make sense either. Why did you want to do it Stasi ? devik On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Stef Coene wrote:> On Friday 26 April 2002 01:10, Stasi wrote: > > Can I use the same SFQ queue dicipline for all the classe in a CBQ or > > HBT system? > No. > If you add a SFQ, you can specify a handle. But you can''t add the same SFQ > (with the same handle) to a second class. So each class gets his own SFQ.
Hi All, I have almost finished second attempt for the next HTB generation. The first one (not the one publicaly available) based on hierarchy of counters was too complex and yelded only cca 30% speed improvement. Current test one is based on hierarchy of RB-trees and what remain to do is to implement walking over these trees (update is done) and then test and measure it. I hope in much better speed and scalability. If someone is interested in such work and become co-author let me know. The main problem lies in my time shortage so that I''m not able to work at it too often. best regards, devik
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Martin Devera wrote:> I have almost finished second attempt for the next HTB generation. > The first one (not the one publicaly available) based on hierarchy of > counters was too complex and yelded only cca 30% speed improvement. > Current test one is based on hierarchy of RB-trees and what remain > to do is to implement walking over these trees (update is done) and > then test and measure it. I hope in much better speed and scalability. > If someone is interested in such work and become co-author let me > know. The main problem lies in my time shortage so that I''m not > able to work at it too often.Where is the new code? pvl
The new code is private at this time - it can''t be compiled - in reality I;m working on it 4 weeks and I never tried to compile it ;) I''ll create web page for it at luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/ in hour or so .. devik On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Pavel Mores wrote:> > know. The main problem lies in my time shortage so that I''m not > > able to work at it too often. > > Where is the new code?
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:55:01AM +0200, Martin Devera wrote:> The new code is private at this time - it can''t be compiled - in > reality I;m working on it 4 weeks and I never tried to compile it ;) > > I''ll create web page for it at luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/ in hour > or so ..OK, thanks - it''s hard to say "I want/can do it" if one is not really sure *what* exactly needs to be done. ;-) pvl> On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Pavel Mores wrote: > > > > know. The main problem lies in my time shortage so that I''m not > > > able to work at it too often. > > > > Where is the new code?