Hi all, I'm a bit concerned about the following statement included in 2.6.0-test4: +For active users, you are better off using the klibc BitKeeper +repositories, at http://klibc.bkbits.net/ Since I refuse to use bk because I consider the anti-competition clause in the free bk license to (a) be abhorrent and (b) meaning that it's of at best questionable legality for me to use free BK, that I'm effectively locked out of this loop. Anyone have any ideas how we can reasonably deal with this? -hpa
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 12:41, H. Peter Anvin wrote:> Anyone have any ideas how we can reasonably deal with this?I keep the CVS and BK repositories tightly in sync, so I don't care who wants to use what. It's only a little bit of overhead for me to do that, and it means I don't have to use CVS and you don't have to use BK, so everyone's happy. <b