search for: tightly

...EG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, > > + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1, > > We can fit this into less lines, like done for features_legacy. Wrt packing code more tightly, I did it like this to make it easier to compare the arrays. Each flag is on the same line in original and new array. > I was asking myself if we could do the conversion of the statical values > somehow upfront, to reduce the patch size and avoid cpu_to_virtio.* at those > places. > &...

...EG_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_SIZE_MAX, VIRTIO_BLK_F_GEOMETRY, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO, VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY, > > + VIRTIO_BLK_F_MQ, > > + VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1, > > We can fit this into less lines, like done for features_legacy. Wrt packing code more tightly, I did it like this to make it easier to compare the arrays. Each flag is on the same line in original and new array. > I was asking myself if we could do the conversion of the statical values > somehow upfront, to reduce the patch size and avoid cpu_to_virtio.* at those > places. > &...

This patch provides a simple way to break out of a tight loop and bug: from the hypervisor monitor press ctrl-A, ctrl-A, ctrl-Z Signed-off-by: Robert S. Phillips (rphillips@virtualiron.com) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

How do I specify a "tight" y-axis, where the plot completely fills the y-axis range, inside the prepanel function? For example, consider the following code: require(lattice) set.seed(12345) x <- 1:1000 y <- cumsum(rnorm(length(x))) prepanel.test <- function(x, y, groups = NULL, subscripts = NULL, ...) { if (is.null(groups)) { result <- list(ylim = range(y)) }

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Turner <probata at hotmail.com> wrote: > With gcc -O3 4.2 and 4.4 we match 1.0s.   The LLVM, after running it through > opt -std-compile-opts, is around 1.7s. Hmm, on my computer, I get around 2.5 seconds with both gcc -O3 and llvm-gcc -O3 (using llvm-gcc from svn). Not sure what you're doing differently; I wouldn't be surprised if

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Jonathan Turner <probata at hotmail.com> wrote: > The crux of the example still seems intact. Have you tried putting something non-trivial (like asm("nop;");) where you'd put the code that runs on the timeout? -Eli

On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 2:31 PM Kingsley Tart - Barritel Ltd < kingsley.tart at barritel.com> wrote: > Hi, > > We're using Asterisk 13.17.0 with PJSIP 2.8 bundled. > > I've found an issue when Asterisk tries to make a SIP call out using > auth, but has the wrong credentials and keeps getting returned a SIP > 407, in this example to an OpenSIPs server requiring

On Wed, 2020-10-28 at 14:40 -0300, Joshua C. Colp wrote: > This is not yet fixed, but is being worked on. I have it as a > security issue currently out of caution (although I don't think we'll > treat it as one after further investigation). Right OK, thanks. Do you have any idea of the sort of timescale, and whether it'll be available as a patch that we can apply to our

Hi - I saw your posting on the R-help mailing list. Were you ever able to get this working? did you end up switching to use the rsge library? I'm trying to do the same, and not having very much luck getting it going. Thanks! Peter Waltman [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

dovecot-1.2.8 creates /var/run/dovecot mode 750. I run postfix+dovecot in a virtual user setup. Postfix calls deliver as user vmail group vmail. Nov 29 12:53:04 imap.invalid dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.error] deliver(frank): userdb lookup: connect(/var/run/dovecot/auth-master) failed: Permission denied (euid=500(vmail) egid=500(vmail) missing +x perm: /var/run/dovecot) I will say this:

Hi, What if some fail2ban magic could keep OpenSIPs response from hitting Asterisk after N attempts ? Le mer. 28 oct. 2020 à 18:32, Kingsley Tart - Barritel Ltd < kingsley.tart at barritel.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > We're using Asterisk 13.17.0 with PJSIP 2.8 bundled. > > I've found an issue when Asterisk tries to make a SIP call out using > auth, but has the wrong

Any tips or guidance on improving the probability of being able to connect to a Tinc daemon. I am currently on a guest wifi at a hospital for my in-laws family. Wanting to pass time and be semi productive, I tried to VPN back to my private networks but it appears the default port Tinc users is blocked. Here is what I know about their firewall:

I was playing around in x86 assembly the other day, looking at ways to optimize my cooperative multitasking system. Currently, it uses a 'timeout' counter that is decremented each time through a loop, letting me stop the loop and go to the next cooperative thread if the loop runs a little long. The asm has two overlapping loops: --- _main: mov ecx, 1000000000 timeoutloop:

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Jonathan Turner <probata at hotmail.com> wrote: > For which version of gcc?  I should mention I'm on OS X and using the LLVM > SVN. gcc 4.3. It's also possible this is processor-sensitive. >> First, try looking at the generated code... the code LLVM generates is >> probably not what you're expecting. I'm getting the

We have spent some time setting up Sun Grid Engine and OpenMPI on a group of linux boxes. I have created a parallel environment and everything seems to be working. I have Rmpi 0.5.5-5 installed on all machines. I would like to start an interactive R session using, say, 8 processors and then start the Rmpi cluster. I haven't been able to find what needs to be done in order to accomplish

We've been using rsync since forever to back up all our servers and it's worked without a problem. But in a recent security review, we noted that our specific rsync backup host is using root keys to access the server, meaning that if the keys on the backup server were leaked/compromised in any fashion, that would provide r00t access to the servers being backed up. Since this

> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:41:45 -0800 > From: eli.friedman at gmail.com > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Tight overlapping loops and performance > > Hmm, on my computer, I get around 2.5 seconds with both gcc -O3 and > llvm-gcc -O3 (using llvm-gcc from svn). Not sure what you're doing > differently; I wouldn't be surprised if it's

...s. Regards, Utpal Bora Ph.D. Scholar +917032002001 Computer Science & Engineering IIT Hyderabad On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Hongbin Zheng <etherzhhb at gmail.com> wrote: > In the design the LLVM passes always directly communicate with PolyhedralInfo, > this requires Polly tightly integrate in to LLVM. > > If we do not want a tight integration, we can do the following: > 1. Introduce an abstract memory dependency query interface, like > AliasAnalysis > 2. I remember LLVM had already have dependency analysis, this can be the > default implementation of the m...

Hi Guys, I saw in the API that DominanceFrontier has been deprecated. Is this for real? I have read the computational issues but shouldn't that be left to the users of llvm? My concern is I am writing a Control Dependence module that uses Dominance-Frontier information. Getting rid of Dominance Frontiers will put me in a tight spot. George -------------- next part -------------- An HTML

Hi Sean, As for the part that couples them too tightly, would you recommend I just > keep my own specialized version of CompileOnDemandLayer.h that includes > this functionality, or do you have any ideas for a cleaner way to do this? My apologies - I wasn't very clear in my description of the issue. The only sense in which your original pat...