B.K.Raghuram
2014-Oct-30 07:26 UTC
[Gluster-users] "Official" word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?
I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is "officially" deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of just one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that new bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always available.. Thanks, -Ram -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20141030/092488e8/attachment.html>
Kaushal M
2014-Oct-30 07:41 UTC
[Gluster-users] [Gluster-devel] "Official" word on gluster replace brick for 3.6?
'replace-brick commit force' is still going to be available. It's just that data-migration for replace-brick is going to be removed. So 'replace-brick (start|stop)' are going to be deprecated. To replace a brick in a replica set, you'll need to do a 'replace-brick commit force'. Self-healing will take care of filling the new brick with data. ~kaushal On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, B.K.Raghuram <bkrram at gmail.com> wrote:> I just wanted to check if gluster replace brick commit force is "officially" > deprecated in 3.6? Is there any other way to do a planned replace of just > one of the bricks in a replica pair? Add/remove brick requires that new > bricks be added in replica count multiples which may not be always > available.. > > Thanks, > -Ram > > _______________________________________________ > Gluster-devel mailing list > Gluster-devel at gluster.org > http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel >