Here is basic question: Are we more likely to avoid a split brain scenario if we have more than 2 bricks total? IOW, one brick on at least three servers or more? Thanks. -Geoff -- ---- Geoff Galitz, ggalitz at shutterstock.com WebOps Engineer, Europe Shutterstock Images http://wwww.shutterstock.com/
On 05/11/2012 01:58 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:> Are we more likely to avoid a split brain scenario if we have more than 2 > bricks total? IOW, one brick on at least three servers or more?Yes.
Jeff Darcy <jdarcy at ...> writes:> Heh. I knew there'd be a follow-up. I seriously couldn't think of anything > more useful to say before, and couldn't resist the opportunity to balance my > usual verbosity with a dose of brevity, but I'll be glad to address further > questions as best I can. >Hello, I am interested in high availability and I need to know as many info you can give me about your implementation in glusterfs. For example: I need three copy of my data just to have a real quorum? Or I need three bricks and only two copies of data? Do I need a fencing device? (Pacemaker guys say that a stonith is mandatory) Thank in advance for any info. Mario