Gluster users - Apr 2010 - other cluster fs-- was - No space left on device (when there is actually lots of free space)

Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready
either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will
handle things better than gluster.

home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/

wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page

Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2

I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them.

keep us informed,
Ron

-- 
Plato seems wrong to me today.

Hi Ron,

Thanks for your suggestion, I might take a look on Ceph.

However, while looking for a good alternative on Glusterfs, I found that 
the most mature, widely used and well documented alternative is Lustre. 
It seems pretty cool and the only drawback is having to compile kernel 
modules (which some times is just not an option).

Did anyone made a good benchmark between Lustre and Gluster?

-kali-


El 08/04/2010 10:14, Ronald Pottol escribi?:
> Ceph just got in to the Linux kernel. It claims not to be prod ready
> either, but not sure how true that is. It does look like it will
> handle things better than gluster.
>
> home page: http://ceph.newdream.net/
>
> wiki: http://ceph.newdream.net/wiki/Main_Page
>
> Mailing list: http://marc.info/?l=ceph-devel&r=1&b=201004&w=2
>
> I'm slowly heading towards having to install and test the two of them.
>
> keep us informed,
> Ron
>
>