Matt,
replies inline.
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Matt Lawrence <matt.lawrence at
tamu.edu>wrote:
> I have maintenance windows on Wednesday & Thursday to make changes to
> the throughput cluster here and I could use some advice.
>
> There are 130 system, 126 of them are compute nodes, connected via Gb
> ethernet with the head node and fileserver node connected via 10Gb
> ethernet. At the moment, my configuration from last summer, which was
> done in a hurry, is running really, really slow.
>
> My hope is to upgrade to 1.4.0, but I'll settle for a release candidate
> if I have to. Here is the rough plan for how I'm going to configure
it.
>
> Server:
> XFS filesystem -->> io-thread -->> tcp
XFS filesystem -->> io-thread -->> write-behind -->> tcp
>
>
>
> Client:
> brick -->> readahead -->> writebehind
>
brick -->> io-thread -->> write-behind -->> io-cache
-->> readahead
>
> Should I be considering readahead/writebehind on the server end?
> How about threads on the client?
> Any other translators I should consider?
>
> I'm hoping to spend much of Thursday doing performance testing. What
> benchmarks do y'all recommend? I was planning on trying iozone, but
> could easily be convinced to go with something else. The plan is to
> script it to run automatically with a number of different settings for
> readahead & writebehind. Any particular words of wisdom?
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> -- Matt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gluster-users mailing list
> Gluster-users at gluster.org
> http://zresearch.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/gluster-users
>
--
gowda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://supercolony.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/attachments/20081228/0f70c071/attachment.html>