> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ?abandoned projects? on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC has moved from SourceForge to Xiph.org. Perhaps consider to remove >> the downloads from SourceForge but keep the ticket system there? > > I was aware of for the Win-gimp issue. What I'd like to know is how > SF.net figures out if a project is abandoned. > > Erik >The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that. Maurits
Erik de Castro Lopo
2015-May-28 11:27 UTC
[flac-dev] Strange things happening at SourceForge
MauritsVB wrote:> The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the > original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that.Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since 2009 or so. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/
On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote:> MauritsVB wrote: > >> The response from SF suggests that it?s non-responsiveness from the >> original project owner. Hopefully it?s limited to that. > > Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since 2009 > or so. > > ErikI meant who is registered as project owner, not neccesarily who started it. You are listed as ?flac-maitainer? (sic) so I assume it will be alright when SourceForge needs to contact someone. Maurits.