On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 ext3-users-request@redhat.com wrote
:>Send Ext3-users mailing list submissions to
> ext3-users@redhat.com
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ext3-users-request@redhat.com
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
> ext3-users-admin@redhat.com
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>specific
>than "Re: Contents of Ext3-users digest..."
>
>Today's Topics:
>
> 1. some benchmarks (Christian Kujau)
> 2. Re: some benchmarks (kwijibo@zianet.com)
> 3. Re: How to determine Ext2/3 FileSystem state ? (Satish
>Singhal)
> 4. Can we resize an ext23 partition without unmounting ??
>(Sugunakar Ambati)
> 5. Re: How to determine Ext2/3 FileSystem state ? (Andreas
>Dilger)
>hi,
>
>i've made *some* benchmarks, i plan to do more. benchmarks
>requests welcome, e.g. "please test this...with that.."
>
>https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/benchmark.html
>
>but only in
>
>https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/prinz
>
>are results right now.
>I hope this is helpful.
>
>Thanks,
>Christian.
>
>
>Hows about trying out the htree code? Htree in conjunction
>with NFS would be great.
>
>Steve
>
>Christian Kujau wrote:
>
>>hi,
>>
>>i've made *some* benchmarks, i plan to do more. benchmarks
>>requests welcome, e.g. "please test this...with that.."
>>
>>https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/benchmark.html
>>
>>but only in
>>
>>https://ephigenie.kicks-ass.net/bench/prinz
>>
>>are results right now.
>>I hope this is helpful.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Christian.
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Ext3-users mailing list
>>Ext3-users@redhat.com
>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>>
>>
>
>
for getting state of ext2 filesystem there is a field in super
block
telling state of ext2.
ravindra mahala
>>See ext3_sync_super_lockfs(), ext3_unlockfs(), and the LVM
>>VFS-locking patch.
>>These are used to put the filesystem into a stable state for a
>>short time
>>until the snapshot is created.
>>
>
>Sir,
>
>Thanks for your response.
>But my problem is a bit different.
>Once the snapshot is taken, how do I determine that the given
>snapshot image (Ext2/Ext3 File-System) is indeed consistent.
>
>Is there any field in super-block or any other on-disk structure
>which could tell the state of a raw File-System(Ext2/3) image.
>
>Regards,
>Satish Singhal
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Are you Unmarried? Register in India's No 1 Matrimony.
>http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?4d
>
>
>Hi all,
>Can we resize an ext3 partition without unmounting?
>
>Regards,
>Sugunakar Ambati
>
>
>On Jun 24, 2003 10:55 +0530, Satish Singhal wrote:
> > >See ext3_sync_super_lockfs(), ext3_unlockfs(), and the LVM
>VFS-locking
> > >patch.
> > >These are used to put the filesystem into a stable state for
>a short time
> > >until the snapshot is created.
> >
> > Thanks for your response.
> > But my problem is a bit different.
> > Once the snapshot is taken, how do I determine that the given
>snapshot image
> > (Ext2/Ext3 File-System) is indeed consistent.
> >
> > Is there any field in super-block or any other on-disk
>structure which could
> > tell the state of a raw File-System(Ext2/3) image.
>
>After the snapshot is taken (as above), the absence of
>EXT3_VALID_FS in
>s_mount_state, or the presence of EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RECOVER
>in
>s_feature_incompat means that the snapshot was not valid.
>
>Cheers, Andreas
>--
>Andreas Dilger
>http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
>http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ext3-users mailing list
>Ext3-users@redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ext3-users
>
___________________________________________________
Impress your clients! Send mail from me @ mycompany.com .
Just Rs.1499/year.
Click http://www.rediffmailpro.com to know more.
