Dan Christensen via dovecot wrote:> I should add that these problems arise frequently in practice, even if > changes are only being made on a single machine, e.g. laptop1. Flag > changes on laptop1 propagate to server, but then are reverted on server > when laptop2 syncs with server, and then are reverted on laptop1 when it > syncs again with server. If I redo the flag changes on laptop1, the > process just repeats and they are removed again. > > Suggestions for debugging are very welcome, as currently syncing is > much too unreliable for me to continue using it. > > DanI (and others) have the same issue. A quote from Stephan Bosch on 20-1-2019:>> We're working on it. We have reproduced the problem without difficulty and isolated the commit that caused it. > > Tracking internally as DOP-842. > > Regards, > > Stephan.Marc> > On Feb 16, 2019, Dan Christensen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > >> I'm running dovecot 2.3.4.1 from https://repo.dovecot.org/ on Ubuntu >> 18.04 on three machines that I'll call server, laptop1 and laptop2. >> >> Both laptop1 and laptop2 run dovecot sync against server to keep local >> copies of my imap folders. Even when I initially had only two machines, >> laptop1 and server, I occasionally noticed that flags were lost, usually >> custom flags used by Gnus, but I couldn't reliably reproduce the >> problem. >> >> Now that I have two laptops syncing against the server, the problem has >> gotten worse and I figured out a way to reproduce it: >> >> - on server: create new IMAP folder test, and put two read messages in it >> - on laptop1: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> - on laptop2: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> >> At this point, all three machines show the two messages M1 and M2 >> as being read. >> >> - on laptop1: mark message M1 unread >> - on laptop2: mark message M2 unread >> - on laptop1: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> Both laptop1 and server have M1 unread, M2 read, as expected. >> - on laptop2: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> Now laptop2 and server have M1 *read*, M2 unread. >> - on laptop1: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> Now laptop1 and the server have both M1 and M2 *read*. >> - on laptop2: doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -f user at server >> Now laptop2 has both read as well. >> >> The two lines that say "*read*" are wrong in my opinion. dsync >> propagated a read mark to an unread message, even though that message >> was marked unread more recently than it was marked read. >> >> I usually use stateful sync, and get many related problems. >> I just did a test in which M1 and M2 started out read, and I >> started with empty files named dstate.test on laptop1 and laptop2. >> Then I did the above procedure, using the command >> >> doveadm sync -u user -l 10 -m test -s "`cat dstate.test`" user at server > dstate.test >> >> At the end, laptop2 and server had both messages unread (which is good), >> but laptop1 had only M1 unread, and repeated runs of the sync command >> did not correct this. So the stateful sync failed to detect a change. >> >> Are these bugs in dovecot? Is there more information that I can >> provide? The output of doveconf -n on one machine is below, and >> the others are almost identical. >> >> Thanks for any help! >> >> Dan >> >> # 2.3.4.1 (3c0b8769e): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf >> # OS: Linux 4.15.0-45-generic x86_64 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS >> # Hostname: laptop2 >> auth_mechanisms = plain login >> listen = 127.0.0.1 >> mail_index_log2_max_age = 10 days >> mail_index_log_rotate_min_age = 1 days >> mail_index_log_rotate_min_size = 300 k >> mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir >> namespace inbox { >> inbox = yes >> location >> mailbox Drafts { >> special_use = \Drafts >> } >> mailbox Junk { >> special_use = \Junk >> } >> mailbox Sent { >> special_use = \Sent >> } >> mailbox "Sent Messages" { >> special_use = \Sent >> } >> mailbox Trash { >> special_use = \Trash >> } >> prefix >> } >> passdb { >> args = scheme=CRYPT username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users >> driver = passwd-file >> } >> protocols = imap >> service imap-login { >> inet_listener imap { >> address = * >> port = 143 >> } >> inet_listener imaps { >> address = * >> port = 943 >> ssl = yes >> } >> } >> service imap { >> process_limit = 25 >> } >> ssl_cert = </etc/dovecot/private/dovecot.pem >> ssl_client_ca_dir = /etc/ssl/certs >> ssl_dh = # hidden, use -P to show it >> ssl_key = # hidden, use -P to show it >> userdb { >> args = username_format=%u /etc/dovecot/users >> driver = passwd-file >> } >> protocol lda { >> postmaster_address = [elided] >> } >> protocol imap { >> mail_max_userip_connections = 20 >> } >
Dan Christensen
2019-Feb-23 19:34 UTC
flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
On Feb 19, 2019, Marc Weustink via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:> I (and others) have the same issue.Thanks, but the issue described in that thread is not the same issue. I don't believe IMAP MOVE is used in the test case I outlined. And I can also reproduce it with 1:2.2.33.2-1ubuntu4.2, whereas the issue in that thread was not present in 1:2.2.36-1. Does anyone else have input on this problem? I used offlineimap for years without losing flags, but I was hoping to use dovecot sync in the future, since it is a lot faster. Several times per day I also have the problem that sync stops working and I have to remove the state file for new messages to be noticed. I'm happy to help debug these issues. Thanks, Dan
Dan Christensen
2019-Mar-12 23:23 UTC
flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
In another thread, Timo wrote: On Mar 12, 2019, Timo Sirainen via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote:> That bug is fixed with attached patch.Thanks! I'm attaching the patch here, so it is in this thread as well. A couple of questions before I test this: - Do I need the patch on the remote end of the sync, or the local end, or both? - Does it make sense to try it based on the master-2.3 branch from git? Following https://wiki.dovecot.org/CompilingSource ? I'll report back once I've tested it. Dan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 2656.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 1225 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190312/e3ea33fb/attachment.bin>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
- flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
- flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
- flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)
- flags not synced correctly with dovecot sync (dsync)