Hi! It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have been restored. Aki
On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:> Hi! > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers temporarily > disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now taken actions > to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled members have > been restored. > > Aki > >I've seen that happen on several lists. I disabled DMARC on my mail servers. I really like the concept but way way way too many false positives. Mostly lists, but also what sometimes happens - primary MX for whatever.com is down so mail goes to their backup with then relays it to their primary when primary back up, but their backup MX obviously isn't in my SPF record and they have things mis-configured causing a DMARC trigger. I like the concept but it seems to have too many problems in implementation.
UNSUBSCRIBE> -----Original Message----- > From: dovecot [mailto:dovecot-bounces at dovecot.org] On Behalf > Of Michael A. Peters > Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 8:21 AM > To: dovecot at dovecot.org > Subject: Re: DMARC policies > > On 11/29/2018 11:13 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > Hi! > > > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers > temporarily > > disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now > taken actions > > to prevent this in the future and all temporarily disabled > members have > > been restored. > > > > Aki > > > > > > I've seen that happen on several lists. > > I disabled DMARC on my mail servers. I really like the > concept but way > way way too many false positives. > > Mostly lists, but also what sometimes happens - primary MX for > whatever.com is down so mail goes to their backup with then > relays it to > their primary when primary back up, but their backup MX > obviously isn't > in my SPF record and they have things mis-configured causing a DMARC > trigger. > > I like the concept but it seems to have too many problems in > implementation. >
Aki Tuomi wrote:> Hi! > > It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers > temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now > taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily > disabled members have been restored. > > AkiHi AKi I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed as nomail before, do I need to update that myself? thanks Per -- Per Jessen, Z?rich (6.2?C) http://www.cloudsuisse.com/ - your owncloud, hosted in Switzerland.
On 30.11.2018 10.03, Per Jessen wrote:> Aki Tuomi wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> It seems we accidentically had a high amount of subscribers >> temporarily disabled due to DMARC on some sender's host. We have now >> taken actions to prevent this in the future and all temporarily >> disabled members have been restored. >> >> Aki > Hi AKi > > I guess my address was re-subscribed then? I was subscribed as nomail > before, do I need to update that myself? > > > thanks > Per > >Yes. I had to do it with an automated script and mailman withlist interface is crappy. Sorry about this. Aki